Effect of Cutting Dates on Forage Yield of Three Vicia Varieties (Vicia Spp.) in Sulaimani Governorate. | ||
Kirkuk University Journal For Agricultural Sciences | ||
Volume 14, Issue 3, September 2023, Pages 351-359 PDF (763.26 K) | ||
Document Type: Research Paper | ||
DOI: 10.58928/ku23.14335 | ||
Authors | ||
Tara O. Mohammed1; Jwan G. Rafaat1; Ako H. Mahmood* 2 | ||
1Biotechnology and Crops Science Department, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Sulaimani, Sulaimani, IRAQ. | ||
2Department of Forestry, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, Salahaddin University, Erbil, IRAQ. | ||
Abstract | ||
During the winter season of 2021-2022, a field experiment was conducted at Qlyasan locations in Sulaimani governorate. The aim of this research was to examine the consequence of cutting dates on the yield of forage and seeds, as well as on the components of various Vicia varieties. The experiment was designed as a factorial design and conducted using a randomized complete block design. The least significant difference (L.S.D.) test with a significance level of 5% was used for the statistical analysis. The three Vicia varieties tested were common vetch (Vicia sativa), narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis), and bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia). Two cutting dates were used, namely, control (Co, no cut), cut 1 (80 days after sowing), and cut 2 (20 days after the first cut). The findings of this research demonstrated that the interaction between common vetch and cutting at 80 days after sowing produced the highest values of the dry matter percentage trait. Meanwhile, the interaction between narbon vetch and cutting 20 days following the initial cut produced the maximum fresh yield (ton/ha) and stem dry weight (g) values. The highest recorded values for the characteristics "pod count per plant" and "seed yield (kg/ha)" were obtained through the interaction between the control treatment and narbon vetch. However, the interaction between cutting at 80 days after sowing and narbon vetch produced the highest values of the 100-seed weight trait (gm). The variation in climatic conditions between seasons may explain these results. | ||
Keywords | ||
Common vetch; Narbon vetch; Bitter vetch; Seed Yield; Cutting; and Forage Yield | ||
References | ||
[1] Gresta, F., Oteri, M., Scordia, D., Costale, A., Armone, R., Meineri, G., & Chiofalo, B. (2023). White Lupin (Lupinus albus L.), an Alternative Legume for Animal Feeding in the Mediterranean Area. Agriculture, 13(2), 434..
[2] Ladizinsky, G. (1998). Plant Evolution under Domestication; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA; London, UK,.
[3] Zohary, D.; Hopf, M. (2000). Domestication of Plants in the Old World, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA.
[4] Larbi, A., Abd El-Moneim, A.M., Nakkoul, H., Jammal, B. and Hassan, S., (2010). Intra-species variations in yield and quality determinants in Vicia species: 2. Narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Animal feed science and technology, 162(1-2), pp.20-27.
[5] Huang, Y., Zhang, Z., Nan, Z., Unkovich, M., & Coulter, J. A. (2021). Effects of cultivar and growing degree day accumulations on forage partitioning and nutritive value of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) on the Tibetan plateau. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 101(9), 3749-3757.
[6] Zoghlami, A. and Hassen, H. (2004). 'Ressources génétiques des espèces spontanées de légumineuses fourragères et pastorales en Tunisie', A. Ferchichi (compiler). Réhabilitation des pâturages et des parcours en milieux méditerranéens. CIHEAM-IAMZ (Zaragoza, Spain), pp. 375-377.
[7] Sayar, M. and Yavuz, H.A.N., (2014). Determination of forage yield performance of some promising narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) lines under rainfed conditions in Southeastern Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(4), pp.376-386.
[8] Kendir, H., sahin-demirbag, N., Aasim, M. & Khawar, K. M. (2009). In vitro plant regeneration from Turkish Narbon Vetch (Vicia narbonensis L. var. narbonensis L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 8.
[9] Lithourgidis, A.S., Vasilakoglou, I.B., Dhima, K.V., Dordas, C.A. and Yiakoulaki, M.D., (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research, 99(2-3), pp.106-113.
[10] Joel Bagg. (2012). Forage Report, Taking That Fall Cutting Of Alfalfa.Mekuanint Gashaw, Ashenafi Mengistu and, Diriba Gelti, Accepted 2 June, 2015. Biomass yield dynamics and nutritional quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars at Debre Zeit, Ethiopia.
[11] Tuna C. and A. Orak. (2007). The role of intercropping on yield potential of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)/oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivated in pure stand and mixtures. J. Agricultural and B. Sciences. 2(2):14-19.
[12] Rehman, A.U., M. Amjad Ali, B.M. Atta, M. Saleem, A. Abbas and A. R. Mallahi, (2009). Genetic studies of yield related traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Aust. J. Crop Sci., 3: 352-360.
[13] Steel, R.G.D. and J. H. Torrie, (1986). Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. Second Edition, McGraw Hill Co. Inc., New York.
[14] Maleko, D., Mwilawa, A., Msalya, G., Pasape, L., & Mtei, K. (2019). Forage growth, yield and nutritional characteristics of four varieties of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) in the west Usambara highlands, Tanzania. Scientific African, 6, e00214.
[15] Tenikecier, H. S., Orak, A., Deveci, S., & Gültekin, B. (2021). Determination of seed yield and its some characters of some Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) genotypes. Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 10(19), 401-406.
[16] Larbi, A., Abd El-Moneim, A.M., Nakkoul, H., Jammal, B. and Hassan, S., (2011). Intra-species variations in yield and quality determinants in Vicia species: 4. Woolly-pod vetch (Vicia villosa ssp. dasycarpa Roth). Animal feed science and technology, 164(3-4), pp.252-261. | ||
Statistics Article View: 871 PDF Download: 107 |