Performance of grafting loquats combined onto loquat and quince rootstocks on different dates | ||
| Kirkuk University Journal For Agricultural Sciences | ||
| Volume 14, Issue 3, September 2023, Pages 269-279 PDF (1.01 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.58928/ku23.14328 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Rasul R. Aziz* ; Fakhraddin M. Hama-Salih* ; Ibrahim M. Noori | ||
| Department of Horticulture, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region-Iraq. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study was carried out during February 20 to July 1, 2023, at the lath house in the College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, University of Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq, and aimed to investigate the impact of rootstock type and grafting time on grafting success of loquat on two rootstocks, loquat and quince, which were used for grafting the local selection cultivar of loquat at three different times (February 20, March 10, and March 30) during the dormant season. The experiment was laid down in a factorial Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), involving 6 treatments, each with 5 grafts and 3 replications, resulting in 90 grafts. Data analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and means were separated using Duncan’s multiple range tests (P≤0.05). The loquat and quince rootstocks were grown through seed sowing and cuttings, respectively. Cleft grafting was employed as the grafting method, ensuring the cambium layers of the scion and stock in contact. Grafting success percentage, shoot length, shoot diameter, number of leaves per budling, leaf area, and chlorophyll content were evaluated. Results showed that loquat rootstock exhibited a significantly higher grafting success percentage (97.78%) compared to quince rootstock (84.44%). Regarding vegetative traits, loquat rootstock resulted in significantly longer shoots (11.74 cm) compared to quince rootstock (8.08 cm). The same rootstock showed a higher number of leaves per budling (8.47) and chlorophyll content (43.82 SPAD). Also, the highest significant grafting success percentage (100%) was achieved from the combination of loquat rootstock and two grafting times (February 20 and March 30). The combination of rootstock type and grafting time led to varying shoot characteristics. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Keywords: Cleft grafting,,; ,،grafting time,,; ,،loquat,,; ,،quince,,; ,،rootstock type | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Dimassi O, Hariri A, Akiki R, Rached M. and Hajj F El. Eriobotrya japonica (Loquat) juice production parameters and their effect on sensory attributes and phenolic content. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol. 2020;5(2):475-482. doi:10.22161/ijeab.52.22
[2] Crane, J. H. and Caldeira, M. L. (2006). Loquat Growing in the Florida Home Landscape. Edis, 18: 1–8. doi: 10.32473/edis-mg050-2006.
[3] Polat, A. A. and Akkuş, S. (2022). Effect of some quince rootstocks on inflorescence properties, flowering and fruit set in loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 25 (2): 253–257. doi: 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.910339.
[4] Mng’omba, S. A., Akinnifesi, F. K., Sileshi, G., Ajayi, O. C., Chakeredza, S. and Mwase, W. F. (2008). A decision support tool for propagating Miombo indigenous fruit trees of southern Africa. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7 (25): 4677–4686.
[5] Pina, A. and Errea, P. (2005). A review of new advances in mechanism of graft compatibility- incompatibility. Scientia Horticulturae, 106 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.04.003.
[6] Lin, S. (2007). World loquat production and research with special reference to China. Acta Horticulturae, 750: 37–43. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2007.750.2.
[7] Hueso, J. J., Canete, M. L. and Cuevas, J. (2007). High density loquat orchards: Plant selection and management. Acta Horticulturae, 750: 349–353. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2007.750.55.
[8] Bermede, A. O. and Polat, A. A. (2011). Budding and rooting success of loquat on quince-A and BA-29 quince rootstocks. Acta Horticulturae, 887: 333–336. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.887.57
[9] López-Gómez, E., San Juan, M. A., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Mataix-Beneyto, J., Garcia-Legaz, M. F. and Hernández, J. A. (2007). Effect of rootstocks grafting and boron on the antioxidant systems and salinity tolerance of loquat plants (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 60 (2): 151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.10.007.
[10] Tepe, S. and Koyuncu, M. A. (2020). Effects of different rootstocks on fruit quality of “Gold Nugget” loquat cultivar. Acta Horticulturae, 1292 (2): 31–36. doi: 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2020.1292.4.
[11] Parvin, N., Choudhury, M. S. H., Rahim, M. A. and Bairagi, P. (2017). Effect of scion maturity and time of cleft grafting on the success, survivability and growth in Burmese grape (Baccaurea ramiflora Lour). Digital Repository, 101: 151-153.
[12] Hartmann, H. T., Kester, D. E., Davies, Jr., F. T. and Geneve, R. L. (2014). Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 8th ed. Pearson Education Limited. USA.
[13] Lewis, W. J. and Alexander, M. (2008). Grafting & Budding.
[14] Öztürk, A. (2021). The Effects of different rootstocks on the graft success and scion development of some pear cultivars. International Journal of Fruit Science, 21 (1): 932–944. doi: 10.1080/15538362.2021.1948376.
[15] Rahman, J. (2017). Comparative study on compatibility and growth response of pear varieties on different rootstocks at nursery. Pure and Applied Biology, 6 (1): 286–292. doi: 10.19045/bspab.2017.60026.
[16] Jagannath, M., Mandal, B. K., Singh, R. R. and Jaiswal, U. S. (2011). Effect of age of root stock, grafting time and varieties on the success of softwood grafting in mango. Asian Journal of Horticulture, 6 (2): 412–417.
[17] Karna, A. K., Varu, D. K., Patel, M. K. and Panda, P. A. (2018). Effect of grafting time on success of softwood grafting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7 (08): 3072–3077. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.327.
[18] Chalise, B., Paudyal, K. and Srivastava, S. (2014). Effect of grafting height on success and subsequent growth of acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) saplings. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, 14 (2): 25–32. doi: 10.3126/njst.v14i2.10412.
[19] Coban, N. (2020). Effect of rootstock and cultivars on some branch and leaf characteristics in pear. Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences, 2 (1): 15–22. doi: 10.14744/turkjfas.2020.005.
[20] Onay, A., Pirinç, V., Adiyaman, F., Işikalan, Ç., Tilkat, E. and Başaran, D. (2003). In vivo and in vitro micrografting of pistachio, Pistacia vera L. cv. “Sirt”. Turkey Journal of Biology, 27: 95–100.
[21] Khopade, R. and Jadav, R. G. (2013). Effect of different grafting dates and wrapping materials on success of softwood grafting in custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) cv. local selection. International Journal of Processing and Post Harvest Technology, 9 (2): 806–808. Available at: file:///Y:/PDF/INV/Rohan Jadav 2013_7579.pdf.
[22] Panchal, S. B., Patel, C. R. and Chaudhary, H. L. (2022). Effect of grafting time and method in custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) cv. Sindhan under South Gujarat condition. 11 (11): 1011–1016.
[23] Khushi, G. A., Sarker, T., Islam, S. and Shahriar, A. S. (2019). Effect of grafting time on the success and survivability of different varieties of mango. Biodiversity International Journal, 3 (5): 209–217. doi: 10.15406/bij.2019.03.00147. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 855 PDF Download: 127 |
||