Performance, Selection indices for six cotton genotypes to yield and some Components | ||
| Kirkuk University Journal For Agricultural Sciences | ||
| Volume 14, Issue 3, September 2023, Pages 257-268 PDF (941.42 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.58928/ku23.14327 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mahasty Mlko Sarteb* 1; Mohammed Ibrahim Mohammed* 2 | ||
| 1Department of Field Crops, College of Agriculture, Kirkuk University, Kirkuk, Iraq. | ||
| 2Department of Medicinal and Industrial Plants, College of Agriculture - Hawija, Kirkuk University, Kirkuk, Iraq | ||
| Abstract | ||
| According to the randomized complete block design, a field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station in the Daquq Research Station located 40 km south of Kirkuk at the longitude 28 - 44 ° east and latitude 8 - 35 ° north as a factorial experiment with three factors, six genotypes, three doses of potassium fertilizer, and two spacing between lines, the data were analyzed as a factorial experiment using the analysis of variance method, and the trait averages were compared using Duncan's multi-range test at a probability threshold of 5% for all of the traits evaluated. Montana genotype shows the superiority of No. of fruiting branches with an average of (8.15), Coker 310 genotypes No. of balls per plant with an average of (17.81), Montana genotype boll weight with an average of (4.85), and Coker 310 genotypes of Seed cotton yield per plant show an average of (87.26). While for fertilizer, it exceeded (200) Kg h-1, No. of fruiting branches with an average of (8.29), No. of balls per plant of (17.66), boll weight with an average reached (4.86), and Seed cotton yield per plant, with an average of (84.36). As for the distances between the lines, the distance exceeds 60 cm, in Seed cotton yield per plant with an average of 83.99. As for the best selection index, it was (the number of boll per plant and seed cotton yield per plant which amounted to (124.9922), and the expected genetic improvement was I1234, which included (number of fruiting branches, number of boll per plant, boll weight, and seed cotton yield per plant), which amounted to (8.7753), and the highest relative efficiency of the I2 index, which included (number of bolls per plant) as it reached 3109.95). | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Selection indices; Performance; Gossypium hirsutum; Genotypes | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] El-Mansy, Y.M. (2015). Relative efficiency of direct and indirect selection with selection indices for improving some economic characters in cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) J. Agric. Res. Kafr El-Sheikh Univ., 41 (1): 192- 215.
[2] Al-Jomaily, A. R. A. (2010). Evaluation Performances of Upland Cotton Genotypes and Estimate Some Parameters Genetic and Path Analysis. College of Agriculture and Forestry University of Mosul.
[3] Oosterhout, D. A. loka, Tyson b. raper (2013). P0tassium and stress alleviation physiological functions and management of cotton. Journal of plant nutrition and soil science. 176(3): 331- 343.
[4] Ali, H., D. Muhammad, and S.A. Abid 2005. Weed Control Practices in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Planted on the Bed and Furrow Pak .J. Weeds. Res, 11(1-2):43- 48.
[5] Al-Zubaidy K M D and M A H Al-Falahy (2016) Principles and Procedures of Statistics and Experimental Designs. Republic of the Iraq University of Duhok, Kurdistan Region / Iraq College of Agriculture, Ministry of Higher Education And Scientific Research, Field Crops Department.
[6] Smith, H.F. (1936). A discriminant function for plant selection Ann.Eugen.7:240-250.
[7] Hazel, L.N. (1943) the genetic bases for the construction selection index. Genetics.28:476-490.
[8] AL-Rawi. K.M. and A.A. Ahmed (1984). Evaluation of the relief efficiencies of several selection indices for predicting yield performances in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Iraqi. J. Agric. sci. (zanco) 2:15-27.
[9] Al-zubaidy KMD, and KKA, Al-jubory (2016). Design and Analysis of Genetically Experiments. Dar alwadah for Kingdom-Amman library, printing, and distribution. The Republic of Iraq.
[10] Miller, P.A., J. C. Williams, H. F. Robinson and R. E. Comstock (1958). Estimation of genotypic and environmental variances and covariance in upland cotton and their implication in selection. Agron. J. 50:126-131.
[11] Dawod, K. M; Khalid, K. A; M. I. Mohammed (2013) Heterosis and Combining Ability for Seed Cotton Yield and Its Components Using F2diallel Crosses. University Of Kirkuk Journal of Agriculture Sciences. Special Issue: 542-560.
[12]Dawod, K. M; Abdulslam R. A. Al-Jomaily, Mohammed I. M. Al-Ugady, and Yassir H. S. AL-Aaty (2016). Stability Parameters for Yield and Some of Its Components in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Tikrit University Journal of Agriculture Sciences 16(3): 28-39.
[13] Mohammed I. M. (2014). Estimation of Genetic Diversity in a Number of Cotton Varieties by using Cluster Analysis and Its Relation with Gene Action in Half-Diallel Crossing. University Of Kirkuk Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 7 (4):120-135.
[14] Sarteb, M. M; Mohammed, I. M. (2023) Genotype × Environment interaction for genotype cotton upland Gossypium hirsutum L. Earth and Environmental Science Volume 2196: 000-000 (Acceptable for publication).
[15] Deho Z. A. (2023) Planting Dates Effects on Seed Cotton Yield And Contributed Characters of Cotton Advance Lines under Changing Climatic Conditions of Tandojam, Sindh Pakistan. Pak. J. Agri., Agril. Engg. Vet. Sci., 39 (1): 10-15.
[16] Riaz A. Ullah F. Chohan Sm. Saeed A. Aqeel M. Sher A. Nadeem A. Akram M. Shahid M. Hussnain H. Khalid Mn. (2023) Estimation Of Heterosis And Combining Ability Effects For Yield And Fiber Quality Traits In Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.) Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal: 261: 1-7.
[17] EI- Fesheikawy, A. B. A; M.E. Abdel – salam and B. M. Ramdan, (2014). Application of some selection indices in fairly segregation generations of barbadense cotton. J. plant production, Mansoura univ, voi. 5(7):1317 – 1329.
[18] Mahmoud. A (2020) used a selection index for improving some economic traits in cotton (Gossypium. barbadense L.). Egypt .J. Plant breed. 24(1):21- 40.
[19]Mabrouk. A. H. (2020) Application of some selection procedures for improving some economic characteristics in cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). J. Plant prod .5:365 – 383.
[20] Ramdan, B. M. (2021). Genetic gain and selection criteria effects on lint yield and yield components in segregating population (Giza 88 x A13), J. Plant prod. voi. 6:165 – 178. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 855 PDF Download: 50 |
||