Dynamic Response of Deepwater Pile Foundation Bridge Piers under Current-wave and Earthquake Excitation

Alsultani, Riyadh; Karim, Ibtisam R.; Khassaf, Saleh I.

doi:10.30684/etj.2022.135776.1285

	Dynamic Response of Deepwater Pile Foundation Bridge Piers under Current-wave and Earthquake Excitation
Engineering and Technology Journal
Article 23, Volume 40, Issue 11, November 2022, Pages 1589-1604 PDF (1.88 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2022.135776.1285
Authors
Riyadh Alsultani^* ¹; Ibtisam R. Karim²; Saleh I. Khassaf³
¹Civil Engineering
²University of Technology - Civil Engineering Department - Geomatics Division Al-Sina&#039;a Street, Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate
³Department of Civil Engineering, University of Basrah, Basrah
Abstract
Pile foundation bridges are structures extending in the middle of the sea, so they are subject to currents, waves, and earthquake forces. This article presents a hybrid simulation that was used with input excitations of different current velocities, wave properties, and earthquake amplitudes to assess the non-linear dynamic behavior of pile foundation bridge piers. Based on the interface between MATLAB and ABAQUS software, the general formulations of fluid-structure interaction (FSI) under combined current-wave and earthquake loads are derived. Hydrodynamic and earthquake loading is consistently introduced by creating synthetic time histories of combined current-wave actions and spatially variable ground motion. The behavior of the dynamic model of a deepwater pile foundation bridge for the Songhua River in northeast China was adopted as an example of the study. The accuracy of the created model was verified using prior experimental and analytical computations. It is demonstrated how both linear and nonlinear dynamic behavior performs at various water depths under coupled current-wave-earthquake loading conditions. Revealing interesting aspects, particularly in terms of relative displacement, acceleration, shear, and moment response are shown. The results showed that the hybrid model is an efficient of simulating accurate predictions of the hydrodynamic pressure during earthquake actions for structures in coastal areas.
Highlights
The major methods for investigating the interaction between a wave current and an elevated pile cap foundation are discussed. The changing rule of hydrodynamic pressure with water depths, current speed, wave properties, earthquake amplitudes, and frequencies are presented. A series of combined current-wave-earthquake tests are shown.
Keywords
Nonlinear dynamic analysis; current-wave-earthquake; coupled Matlab-Abaqus; bridge pier; hydrodynamic pressure

References
[1] S. S. AbdelSalam, S. Sritharan, and M. T. Suleiman, Current design and construction practices of bridge pile foundations with emphasis on implementation of LRFD.Journal of Bridge Eng.15 (2010) 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000118 [2] Wei K, Yuan W, Bouaanani N. Experimental and numerical assessment of the three-dimensional modal dynamic response of bridge pile foundations submerged in water. J Bridg Eng, 18 (2013) 1032–1041 [3] Wei C ,Numerical simulation of combined actions of wind and wave and their actions on cylindrical component. Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin,2012. [4] Yang, W., Li, Q. and Yeh, H. Calculation method of hydrodynamic forces on circular piers during earthquakes.Journal of Bridge Engineering, 22 (2017) 04017093. [5] An-jie, W. and Wan-li, Y. Numerical study of pile group effect on the hydrodynamic force on a pile of sea-crossing bridges during earthquakes. Ocean Engineering, 199, 2020,106999. [6] Usciłowska, A., Kołodziej, J.A., Free vibration of immersed column carrying a tip mass. J. Sound Vib. 216 (1998) 147–157. [7] Q. Yue, & x. Bi, ice-induced jacket structure vibrations in bohai sea. J. Cold Reg. Eng. 14 (2002) 81-92. [8] Zhang Yunliang, Li Zhijun, and Lin Gao .Ice-structure dynamic interaction process of DDA simulation. Glacier frozen soil, 25 (2003) 313-316. [9] Liu Chuanguang . Bridge construction response in the earthquake and ice loads. Earthquake engineering and engineering vibration, 25 (2005),141-146. [10] Huang Xin. Seismic excitation-water and pier dynamic interaction analysis. Tianjin University,2008. [11] Gao Xuekui, Zhu Xi, and Li Hui. The seismic response analysis of the deep water bridge pier under Near-field seismic wave. Engineering seismic and reinforcement and reconstruction, 28 (2009) 83-87. [12] Pei Bing. Seismic dynamic response of Hardfill dam comparative analysis. Hydropower energy science, 28 (2010) 85-88. [13] Li, Q. and Yang, W. An improved method of hydrodynamic pressure calculation for circular hollow piers in deep water under earthquake. Ocean Engineering, 72 (2013) 241-256. [14] Jiang, H., Wang, B., Bai, X., Zeng, C. and Zhang, H. Simplified expression of hydrodynamic pressure on deepwater cylindrical bridge piers during earthquakes. Journal of Bridge Eng., 22 (2017a) 04017014 [15] Wang, P., Zhao, M. and Du, X. (2018a). Analytical solution and simplified formula for earthquake induced hydrodynamic pressure on elliptical hollow cylinders in water. Ocean Engineering, 148, 149-160. [16] Wang, J. T., Zhang, M. X., Jin, A. Y. and Zhang, C. H.. Seismic fragility of arch dams based on damage analysis.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 109 (2018b) 58-68. [17] Xu, H., Zou, D., Kong, X., Hu, Z., Su, X. A nonlinear analysis of dynamic interactions of CFRD–compressible reservoir system based on FEM–SBFEM. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 112 (2018) 24–34. [18] Liu, Y., HAMS: a frequency-domain preprocessor for wave-structure interactions—theory, development, and application. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 7 (2019) 81. [19] H. Gou, h. Long, y. Bao, g. Chen, q. Pu, and r. Kang, Stress distributions in girder-arch-pier connections of long-span continuous rigid frame arch railway bridges. Journal of bridge eng, 23 (2018) 7-22. [20] Jiang, H., Wang, B. X., Bai, X. and Zeng, C. Nonlinear dynamic response character of deep-water bridge piers excited by strong near-fault and far-field earthquakes. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science edition), 45 (2017b) 81-86. [21] Pang, Y., Kai, W., Yuan, W. and Shen, G. Effects of dynamic fluid-structure interaction on seismic response of multi-span deep water bridges using fragility function method.Advances in Structural Engineering, 18 (2015) 525-541. [22] Westergaard, H. M. (1933). Water pressures on dams during earthquakes. Transactions of the American society of Civil Engineers, 98 (1933) 418-433. [23] Yang, W. and Li, Q. The expanded Morison equation considering inner and outer water hydrodynamic pressure of hollow piers. Ocean Engineering, 69 (2013) 79-87. [24] Ministry of Communications of China. Code for design of ground base and foundation of highway bridges and culverts. JTG D63-2007, China Communications Press, Beijing (in Chinese),2007. [25] Gruber JJ. Reliability and effect of partially restrained wood shear walls. Wayne State University dissertations. Paper 442,2012. <http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/442/>[accessed25.03.13] [26] Abaqus Analysis User's Manual. Version 6.11, Formulation of Eulerian– Lagrangian contact Section 14.1.1. Dassault Systèmes,2011 [27] Al-Taie, A. J. and Albusoda, B. S. (2019). Earthquake hazard on Iraqi soil: Halabjah earthquake as a case study. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 10 (2019) 196-204. [28] MCPRC, Ministry of Communications of the People’s Republic of China. Code for design of highway reinforced concrete and pre-stressed concrete bridge and culverts. JTGD62-2004. Beijing: China Communications,2004. [29] Bathe, K.-J., J. Walczak, A. Welch, and N. Mistry ,Nonlinear analysis of concrete structures. Comput. Struct. 32 (1989) 563–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90347-7. [30] Khatri, D., and J. C. Anderson. Analysis of reinforced concrete shear wall components using the ADINA nonlinear concrete model. Comput. Struct. 56 (1995) 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00039-J. [31] Mao, M., and C. A. Taylor ,Non-linear seismic cracking analysis of medium-height concrete gravity dams. Comput. Struct. 64 (1997) 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(97)00029-1. [32] Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. (1988). Theoretical stressstrain model for confined concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 114 (1988) 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804). [33] Yang, W.L., Li, A., Li, Q., Wen, Z.B., Zhao, W.L. (2018). Scaling law study for earthquake induced pier–water interaction experiments. Environ. Fluid Mech. 19 (1), 55–79. [34] Yang, W., (2012). Study on hydrodynamic analysis methods of deep-water bridges. [In Chinese.] Ph.D. thesis, Southwest Jiaotong Univ. [35] Zhang, J., Wei, K., Pang, Y., Zhang, M., & Qin, S. (2019). Numerical investigation into hydrodynamic effects on the seismic response of complex hollow bridge pier submerged in reservoir: case study. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 24(2), 05018016. https://doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001340. [36] Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China (2015). JTS145-2015 Code of Hydrology for Harbour and Waterway[S]. China Communications Press, Beijing,2015.
Statistics Article View: 215 PDF Download: 248