Prediction of First Ply Failure of Composite Pressure Vessels Under Internal Pressure: A review | ||
| Anbar Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 9, Volume 13, Issue 1, May 2022, Pages 76-84 PDF (841.58 K) | ||
| Document Type: Review Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37649/aengs.2022.175883 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Naseer Farhood* 1; Abdullah Hamad Singal2 | ||
| 1Electromechanical Engineering Department / UOT , Baghdad , Iraq | ||
| 2Production Engineering & Metallurgy Department, University of Technology, Baghdad, 10066, Iraq. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Composite pressure vessels (i.e. types III and IV) are widely used for compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles, as storage cylinders to reduce the weight while maintaining high mechanical properties. These vessels can achieve 70-80% of weight saving, as compared to steel vessels (type I). So, prediction of first ply failure and burst pressure of these vessels is of great concern. Thus, this paper involved a review of literature regarding the first ply failure and burst pressure of composite pressure vessels (types III and IV). The review included the researches related to the simulation, mathematical modeling, and experimental analysis. The study focused on simulation-related research more than others due to the complexities of mathematical modeling of such problems in addition to the high cost of experimental tests. The results indicated that the stacking sequence of layers, vessel thickness and the type of selected composites were the main factors that mainly affect the vessel burst pressure performance. Accordingly, the optimization in the vessel structure (composite fabric architecture) parameters plays an important role in the performance of burst pressure. This in turn will lead to a high vessel durability, longer life-time and better prediction of burst pressure. Furthermore, the study showed that the prediction of first ply failure is more important than burst pressure knowledge of pressure vessels because it gives an initial prediction of vessel failure before the final failure occurrence. This in turn, may prevent the catastrophic damage of vessel. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Composite Pressure Vessels (CPVs); Types III and IV Vessels; First Ply Failure; Burst Pressure | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Praneeth B, Rao TBS. Finite Element Analysis of Pressure Vessel and Piping Design. Int J of Engineering Trends and Technology 2012; 3(5): 567-70.
[2] Dwivedi N, Kumar V, Shrivastava A, Nareliya R. Burst Pressure Assessment of Pressure Vessel Using Finite Element Analysis: A Review. J of Pressure Vessel Technology 2013; 135(4): 1-5.
[3] Chou H. Damage Analysis of Composite Pressure Vessels Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring. Ph.D. Thesis, Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, RMIT University, 2012.
[4] Tsai SW. Composite Design, Think Composites. New York: Stanford.edu; 1987.
[5] Funck R, Fuchs HP. Development of All-Composite Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Pressure Vessel for Vehicle Use. In: International Conference on Composite Materials; 2001. p. 1-8.
[6] Babu MS, Srikanth G, Biswas S. Composite Fabrication by Filament Winding -An insight. Technology Information, Forecasting, and Assessment Council. Available: http://www.tifac.org.in/news/pub.htm, 2007.
[7] Legault M. Next-generation Pressure Vessels. High-Performance Composites 2012; 20(4): 40-45.
[8] U.S. Composites Shipments, 1996 Market Share, Semi-Annual Statistical Report; 1996.
[9] Reid SR, Al-Hassani ST, Corbett GG. Failure of Composite Pipes under Local Loading. The cost effective use of fiber reinforced composites offshore, Phase I, Final Report, Pipe Elements, Marinetech North West; 1991, (3) 1-30.
[10] Hardy S, Malik N. Optimum Design of Composite-reinforced Pressure Vessels. Applied Stress Analysis, Springer 1990; 429-38.
[11] Önder A. First Failure Pressure of Composite Pressure Vessels, M.Sc. Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Dokuz Eylul University, 2007.
[12] Wang Y, Sun M, Zheng Z, Zhu S. Finite Element Modeling of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Pressure Vessel. In: International Conference on Educational and Network Technology; 2010, p. 259-62.
[13] Sinha M, Pandit SN. Design and Burst Pressures Analysis of CFRP Composite Pressure Vessel for Various Fiber Orientations Angles, Int J of Advances in Engineering Science and Technology 2012; 1(1): 5-40.
[14] Sulaiman S, Borazjani S, Tang SH. Finite Element Analysis of Filament-wound Composite Pressure Vessel under Internal Pressure. In: 2nd International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research; 2013, p. 012061.
[15] Rayapuri A, Ranjith KR, Tirumala R. Design and Analysis of CFRP Composite Multilayer High Pressure Vessels and Burst Pressure Analysis for Various Fiber Orientation Angles. In: International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering; 2013, p. 602-607.
[16] Shanmugavel M, Velmurugan T. Finite Element Analysis of Burst Pressure of Composite Storage Vessels. IOSR J of Mechanical and Civil Engineering 2013: 11-16.
[17] Farhood NH, Karuppanan S, Ya HH, Baharom MA. Burst Pressure Investigation of Filament Wound Type IV Composite Pressure Vessel. In: AIP Conference Proceedings; 2017, p. 030017.
[18] Haris HM, Gang W, Uzair Ahmed D, Zhang W. Optimization of Composite Material System and Lay-up to Achieve Minimum Weight Pressure Vessel. Applied Composite Material 2013; 20(5): 873–89.
[19] Wu QG, Chen XD, Fan ZC, Nie DF. Stress and Damage Analyses of Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels. In: 14th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology; 2015, p. 32-40.
[20] Kangal S, Kartav O, Tanoğlu M, Aktas E, Secil Artem H. Investigation of Interlayer Hybridization Effect on Burst Pressure Performance of Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels with Load-Sharing Metallic Liner. J of Composite Materials 2020; 54(7): 961–80.
[21] Kang H, He P, Zhang C, Dai Y, Lv H, Zhang M, Yang D. Stress-strain and Burst Failure Analysis of Fiber Wound Composite Material High-Pressure Vessel. Polymers and Polymer Composites 2021; 29(8): 1291-1303.
[22] Nebe M, Johman A, Braun C, Van Campen JMJF. The Effect of Stacking Sequence and Circumferential Ply Drop Locations on the Mechanical Response of Type IV Composite Pressure Vessels Subjected to Internal Pressure: A Numerical and Experimental Study. Composite Structures 2022; (294): 115585.
[23] Kam TY, Liu YW, Lee ET. First-ply Failure Strength of Laminated Composite Pressure Vessels. Composite Structures 1997; 38(1-4): 65-70.
[24] Liu PF, Chu JK, Hou SJ, Xu P, Zheng JY. Numerical Simulation and Optimal Design for Composite High-pressure Hydrogen Storage Vessel: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012; 16(4): 1817-27.
[25] Camilleri D, Ellul B, Muscat M. Design by Analysis Methods for Asymmetric or Unbalanced Cylindrical Composite Pressure Vessels. In: Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference; 2014, p. V003T03A011.
[26] Chang RR. Experimental and Theoretical Analyses of First-Ply Failure of Laminated Composite Pressure Vessels. Composite Structures 2000; (49): 237-43.
[27] Cohen D. Influence of Filament Winding Parameters on Composite Vessel Quality and Strength. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 1997; 28(12): 1035-47.
[28] Cohen D, Mantell SC, Zhao L. The Effect of Fiber Volume Fraction on Filament Wound Composite Pressure Vessel Strength. Composites Part B: Engineering 2001; 32(5): 413-29.
[29] Shen FC. A Filament-wound Structure Technology Overview. Materials Chemistry and Physics 1995; 42(2): 96-100.
[30] Xia M, Takayanagi H, Kemmochi K. Analysis of Multi-Layered Filament-Wound Composite Pipes under Internal Pressure. Composite Structure 2001; 53(4): 483-91.
[31] Bakaiyan H, Hosseini H, Ameri E. Analysis of Multi-Layered Filament-Wound Composite Pipes under Combined Internal Pressure and Thermo-Mechanical Loading with Thermal Variations. Composite Structure 2009; 88(4): 532-41.
[32] Leh D, Saffré P, Francescato P, Arrieux R, Villalonga S. A progressive Failure Analysis of a 700-bar Type IV Hydrogen Composite Pressure Vessel. Int J of Hydrogen Energy 2015; 40(38): 13206-14.
[33] Krishnan P, Majid MS, Afendi M, Gibson AG, Marzuki HA. Effects of Winding Angle on the Behaviour of Glass/Epoxy Pipes under Multi-Axial Cyclic Loading. Materials & Design 2015; (88): 196–206.
[34] Ramadhan AA. An Experimental Study of Hybrid/Epoxy Composite Cylinders under Internal Pressure Loading. J of Materials Sciences and Applications 2015; 1(2): 65-69.
[35] Ramirez JPB, Halm D, Grandidier JC, Villalonga S, Nony F. 700 bar Type IV High Pressure Hydrogen Storage Vessel Burst-Simulation and Experimental Validation. Int J of Hydrogen Energy 2015; 40(38): 13183-92.
[36] Joselin R, Enamuthu M, Usha KM, Vasudev ES, Chelladurai TA. A Comparative Study on Failure Pressure Estimations of GFRP Pressure Vessels using Acoustic Emission Technique. In Recent Advances in Space Technology Services and Climate Change 2010; (978): 90-92. IEEE.
[37] Sumana BG, Sagar HV, Krishna M, Rajkumar GR. Investigation of Burst Pressure on Carbon/Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Metal Tube for High Pressure Applications. Procedia Materials Science 2014; (5): 535-39.
[38] Shao Y, Betti A, Carvelli V, Fujii T, Okubo K, Shibata O, Fujita Y. High Pressure Strength of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Vinylester and Epoxy Vessels. Composite Structures 2016; (140): 147–56.
[39] Wang D, Liao B, Hua Z, Gu C, Xu P. Experimental Analysis on Residual Performance of Used 70 MPa Type IV Composite Pressure Vessels. J of Failure Analysis and Prevention 2019; 19(1): 204–11.
[40] Lainé E, Dupré JC, Grandidier JC, Cruz M. Instrumented Tests on Composite Pressure Vessels (Type IV) under Internal Water Pressure. Int J of Hydrogen Energy 2020; 46(1): 1334-46.
[41] Nebe M, Asijee TJ, Braun C, van Campen JMJF, Walther F. Experimental and Analytical Analysis on the Stacking Sequence of Composite Pressure Vessels. Composite Structures 2020; (247): 112429.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,161 PDF Download: 260 |
||