Comment on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal No. 112 / appellate body was Moved / 2012 | ||
| journal of legal sciences | ||
| Article 1, Volume 29, Issue 1, August 2014, Pages 1-8 | ||
| Author | ||
| dr.akrem and dr.abas | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Principle: ((that compensation is considered a thing of the annulment request and can not be compensated only with the annulment)) Resolution: ((at the audit and deliberation found that discrimination is submitted within the legal period, he decided to accept a form and when the review of the judgment deals available appeared to be true and OK with the law came following the decision of Cassation issued a number 1272 / appellate Moved / 2011 12/9/2011, because the distinctive Exchange considering the request for annulment and inventory claim for compensation and that's where the compensation is considered a thing of the annulment and may not seek compensation, but with a request for annulment, it decided to ratify the referee distinctive reportedly challenged discriminatory load with distinctive graphic discrimination and the decision was made in agreement in 29 / spring I / 1433 AH, corresponding to 22/2 / 2012.)) | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Comment on the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal No; appellate body was Moved | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 61 PDF Download: 21 |
||