Diacritic Concomitance (Paresing Diacritic and Constracting Mark) and its Impact on Meanings in Al-Bahir Al-Muheet Explication | ||
| AL-AMEED JOURNAL | ||
| Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 5, December 2012, Pages 261-310 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ahamed Khudheir; ; Abass Al | ||
| Abstract | ||
| A trench mark in linguistics designates a trait, a mountain or something on the ground guiding people; a house or something shepherding people in the wilderness as it is erected. The grammarians employ the shades of meanings to the "mark" to have a universal term covering more than one destination; it could indicate the category of a word or a trait of a noun or the mark of the verb. Then it could refer to the strata of a word nominative, accusative, prepositional, apocopative and constructive. We are, here, to pay much heed to the latter; it is to have the mark in the acts of parsing on one hand in the construction, on the other hand as to be two isles for the trench mark concomitance. Therefore, it is to draw a line of demarcation between both Haraka [mark] and the mark [diacritic], the former designates Dhama, Fatha and Kasra, or it might be a part of the word " phoneme " in terms of declinable case, or it might be a parsing Haraka [Move] or a contrastive Haraka at the end of a word, that is why it comes in parallel with the particles of parsing and construction. Yet the latter, the diacritic purports Dhama, Fatha, Kasra and some letters as regarded by the grammarians as parsing marks,. Haraka and the letter omitting. It is quite evident that parsing marks are a mere rapport between the phonetic level and syntactic one, the parsing letters in dual and sound masculine plural come to be a meeting terminus between the deductive and syntactic level. Then only then, the research paper takes hold of the concomitance as regarded as a great concomitance having two isles: 1. Parsing diacritics. 2. Construction mark. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 94 PDF Download: 19 |
||