Meaning Trends in the Possible Linguistic Clusters of the Quranic Contexts | ||
| AL-AMEED JOURNAL | ||
| Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 5, December 2012, Pages 177-214 | ||
| Authors | ||
| ; alan Abidali Sultan | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The paper, here, surveys the trends of meaning taken from various linguistic clusters in the linguistic explication of some verses in the Glorious Quran. It endeavours to clarify the semantic distance between the meanings of each cluster and the nexus between these clusters. What is to the point is that the meaning designates the whole semantic content and not the functional content of the ingredients of the linguistic structure. Having traced the meanings of the linguistic clusters, it is convenient that the inducted meanings from the linguistic clusters of the Quranic structure come through three trends: the first is to have mutual meanings with a little significant difference that never heaves into sight but by strenuous efforts. The second is to have inducted meanings that differ from the linguistic clusters, such differences between the clusters strike the eye as evident; the extent of similarity or difference varies due to the given examples. The third is to have linguistic clusters whose meanings are different. In time, the research paper delves into exposing the impact of the text on reinforcing the linguistic shades to float into being and harmony in the Quranic structures having certain evidences that keep a possible shade different in virtue of acceptability. It comes to the fact that the harmony in the content of the linguistic shades leads to difficulty in exposing the possible contextual evidences for each shade, since the same shade could come in one content. Explicating the minute contextual evidences is a different matter. Yet delving into the linguistic shades for both the different or contradictory meanings appears at ease in exposing the possible evidence for a shade. The more the meanings come into harmony, the harder the acts of explication for the linguistic shades grow, the more the content goes different, the more the meanings grow different, the more dealing with the evidences of possible contexts tends to be applicable. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 185 PDF Download: 44 |
||