اتجاهات تحليل النص الحديثة | ||
مجلة الکلیة الاسلامیة الجامعة | ||
Article 1, Volume 7, Issue 19, March 2012, Pages 65-89 | ||
Author | ||
م.م. مصعب عبد الزهرة رحيم الخزعلي | ||
Abstract | ||
Discourse analysis focuses on finding out the communicative value of stretches of sentences in a given context. It is achieved by exploring the relations that make connectivity and unity in texts at various levels: such as syntactic, semantic, phonological, pragmatic and the like ( see Crystal, 2003: s.v. discourse; Matthews, 2007: s.v. discourse).Generally speaking, the classical approaches to discourse analysis are numerous, but the most common are: the functional systemic approach {which means that texts (and language in general) is a system of interrelations}, functional sentence perspective (FSP) {which deals with the information that each utterance has in relation to one another, particularly the reference to what is called 'theme and rheme'}, and schematic cognitive discourse analysis {which studies the background knowledge of humans in terms of mental scripts or frames that enable them interpret various types of discourse }(see Brown & Yule, l983). However, modern theories of discourse analysis concentrate on the hidden ideas at various cultural and mental levels such as social, political, economical, religious, advertisemental, racial, and so on. These are numerous, and we will focus on the most influential ones. Moreover, this study focuses that the way we perceive language is the foundation of our social construction and individual or group relationships, and studies in sociolinguistics have tried to explain this relationship between the use of language and the importance of perceptions. A particular discourse, spoken or written, can stem from different sources such as power, cultural or social background, region or social status. In this study, some of the most prominent approaches are to be discussed. | ||
Keywords | ||
اتجاهات تحليل النص الحديثة | ||
Statistics Article View: 44 PDF Download: 22 |