Criminal Procedural apostate ((Comparative study)) | ||
| journal of legal sciences | ||
| Article 1, Volume 27, Issue 2, December 2012, Pages 159-217 | ||
| Author | ||
| dr.yaseer basem | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Criminal procedural legal studies vital for two reasons: first, that the study involves the philosophical and the second to involve a practical aspect, since the idea of the penalty motion on the basis of violation of procedural work of the model specified in the rule of legal procedure, and the offense calls for the rhythm of a sanctions procedure and which ones invalidity or fall, or lack or non-acceptance or other, depending on circumstances, none of these sanctions will not produce procedural work contrary to the model specified in the comparison of legal procedural effects and if the litigation of civil (procedural work) are subject to a penalty motion in general, this study aims mainly to discuss the setting of the impact on the business carried on Criminal Procedure is defective, which is supposed to be free from the penalty procedural and this business may be on the previous work that the procedural defect may be similar to it later | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Criminal Procedural apostate | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 134 PDF Download: 120 |
||