Comment on an unpublished decision discriminatory | ||
| journal of legal sciences | ||
| Article 1, Volume 27, Issue 1, June 2012, Pages 256-263 | ||
| Author | ||
| dr.ali fawzai | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Text the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal No. 62 / expanded body / 2010 on 23 2 2011: Federal Court of Appeal decided in the case of edges Q prosecutor and defendant President of the Federation of cooperative farm associations in Kirkuk, in addition to function as follows: (The two parties have agreed to add the words on the back of the instrument to the effect that the instrument is paid after ten days of the arrival of cars and thus can not be the instrument tool and fulfillment as I went to the Court initially Karrada in its judgment distinctive, rather it is a guarantee for the purpose of delivery vehicles contracted between the parties under the contract of 11 12 2005, and is the instrument as a letter of guarantee for the implementation of the contract, so the court must conduct its investigation into whether the plaintiff had fulfilled its contractual obligations to supply cars contracted adult hundred pickup or not, if found that the plaintiff has fulfilled that obligation shall be the amount due and required the defendant to fulfill it, and otherwise be the case be dismissed devoid of corroboration and thus the insistence of the court in its judgment distinctive misplaced therefore decided undone and re-dossier of the case to her court to follow the above) | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Comment on an unpublished decision discriminatory | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 18 PDF Download: 15 |
||