Criminal Procedures Affecting penal judgment - a comparative study - | ||
| Risalat al-huquq Journal | ||
| Article 1, Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 46-112 PDF (0 K) | ||
| Authors | ||
| nesren mohsen nema; hason ebed hajej | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Ann procedures charismatic in judgement penal if boson difference hers be void posoms imprint procedure void conn from conrt non trouple formative legal correct or it shall be Batas also issued a void as if issued by the court is Mkcklp the formation of a proper legal or released by hand were not competent by ordering accpording to the rules jurisdiction as well as the case if the ruling was issued contrary to the rules of the court if the court which issued constituted a sound legal and competent issuing a Abitnaih the proceedings void, and when the rule is, in this regard is built on falsehood is falsehood,too. This and initating invalidity power penalty automatically simply because the availability of the violotion of procedure but remains the ruling wrang as a rale correctly generators for all its effects but the determined void a court order issued by the compentent court whatever the type of invalidity which was tainted by an absolute or relative however that the difference between the two types of invalidity is that the absolute invalidity can be pronounced by the conrt on its own motion other than relative invalidity which can nat be only basedd on his adherence to the discount interst in his report. And light that study supject search disbarting on chabters contain first chabter case disagceeing procedures a fore-going posoms judgement penal into chris second chabter case disagreeing procedures devoter judgement penal stady conclusion contain vesults and probositions. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Penalty Judgment | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 93 PDF Download: 48 |
||