The Use of two Training Methods of Running with Jump and Bousing in the Field in their | ||
| Modern Sport journal | ||
| Article 1, Volume 11, Issue 17, August 2012, Pages 127-150 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Running with jump and bousing is regarded as one of the methods of sport training that play the important role in develop special endurance, specially in strength resistance characterized by Speed. These are considered as one of the main constituents of physical performance for all athletes in various types of events that require persistence of long time efforts. That is expressed as the ability to perform a certain physical activity during a relatively long time without decrease of the performance level. The problem of this study includes the lack of change in the record of 800 m running event in Arab and Asian record terms. Therefore, this was as an attempt to deal with the Use of two Training Methods of Running with Jump and bouncing in the Field and comparing which of the two methods is best to develop strength resistance for the sample of study. The hypothesis is that there are statistically significant differences in pretest and posttest at the sample. The experimental method and a nonrandom sample of 800 m race runners age (14- 16) was chosen as the sample formed the percentage of %100 of the original research community. The sample was distribute into two group by lot method; the experimental group were trained by use of running bouncing, whereas the second group were trained by the use of jump running with weighting. The experimental group was divided as 8 atheltes for each group. The first group G1 carried out curriculum of running with jumping the second group G2 was trained using the curriculum of running with weighing. In order to verify the harmony of the sample, the two researchers conducted a test for the coefficient of difference and harmony in height, weight and age. The results showed a harmony of the study sample where all values of variables have been less than %30. That indicates the harmony of the sample. The two groups G1 and G2 in ad hoc tests with T-value which has been less than schedule. The instruments | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 151 PDF Download: 76 |
||