A Ssader and Modernist Philosophy | ||
| Al-Mustansiriya Journal of Arts | ||
| Article 1, Volume 0, Issue 57, April 2017, Pages 1-28 | ||
| Author | ||
| Salah Fleifel al-Jabri | ||
| Abstract | ||
| We tried to make some dialectic Approaching between A Ssader and Modernist Philosophers, Hegel, Marx, and Kant. Further, we make some dialogue with criticizer philosophers as Fouqault, Habermas and Dredda. Marx make some transformation in Kantian cognitive elements to social working elements, Whereas A Ssader transform a priory conditions of Kant from being formal to be objective. The object of synthetics, according to Marx, is a contain of work by concepts of workman which immediate by power of work. Whereas, a contains of knowledge, according to A Ssader, is sensory forms, or mental forms derived from sensory forms. Fouqault fall in linguistic Idealism in which the truth is disappear, because it's relation in a power, the aim of synthetics , in A Ssader, that it is reflexes, by itself, the diversity of external world immediate by a priory mental structure. A Ssader and Hegel views to historical movement as it aims to purpose. The absolute purpose, according to Hegel, consists in final materialization of Mind. And this purpose, of A Ssader, is infinite evolutional movement toward God. Habermas define the Truth as social censuses, whereas, of A Ssader, it's reflexes of external world, e.g, The Idea or mind discover reality without considering to social affects. We saw that A Ssader's critical way was philosophical , but, his answers for these philosophical issues was ethical and religious. This was a general pattern of His philosophy, and his economic, and social, theories, even his solution of induction was not for scientific investigation, but for religious purposes, that is, confidence of God by the same method which used for discover of object facts. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 86 PDF Download: 81 |
||