Population distribution and change them in the province of Dhi Qar For the period 1977-1987 --1 997 | ||
| Journal of The Thi Qar Arts | ||
| Article 1, Volume 2, Issue 5, March 2012, Pages 174-216 | ||
| Authors | ||
| dr. adnan unad ghiyadh; mohammed tukheikh mahood | ||
| Abstract | ||
| objective of this research through scientific analysis to reveal the veil on image distribution of the population of the province of Dhi Qar, and interpretation of the changes that have occurred during the period 1977 1997, which brought about the following results: 1. Control of high density and very high on most of the administrative units in the province, where the spread in two axes, a first in those southern part items (center spend Nasiriya, Suq, Aekalah, vine Bani Said, the master of an intruder, Tar), while the extended arms of the second axis portions Central within the (center spend Shatra, and Gharraf), while the axes of decline, was among those eastern and south-eastern and the western and southern sides of Western ones. 2. Showed the proportion of concentration of population in the province fade to clear over the censuses of the three, as evinced by the record (28.9, 36.32, 33.75)% respectively, which shows that the distribution of population, tends towards concentration, not dispersion, where he began dispersion evident in the Census 1977 representing a ratio of 28.9% which is closer to the ideal distribution 3. Revealed to us gauge the presumption Lorenz, that the province of Dhi Qar was the closest to zero in the census 1977, as evinced by the recorded presumption of (0.12) started to move away out in the Census 1987, which reported a presumption of (0.16) and high (0.4), while peaked presumption in the 1997 Census (0.21), which shows the compatibility and harmony with the apparent concentration of population in proportion to this increase and its tendency toward the progressive approach the number one and the trend towards concentration, not dispersion. 4. Away Number and Percent Distribution of the population in the province of Dhi Qar, for consistency and harmony spatially, for most units of the province, where are still centers of districts and rank management plays a clear role in attracting residents and concentration, as administrative centers or official institutions, governmental and economic projects and investment, which led to the polarization of the preparation large population of them, to take advantage of services and employment opportunities that exist there. 5. Look the differences evident in the environmental distribution of the population of the province, where the centers of districts, three (Center for the Elimination of Nasiriyah, Center for Elimination of Suq, Center for the Elimination Shatra) has divested (64.7, 67, 67.4%) of the total urban population, respectively, while did not have the (16) and the administrative unit, but with relative total (35.3, 33, 32.6%), respectively, which shows the extent of inequality and the great variation in the quantity and quality of services provided and the bias in favor of the administrative units of the major at the expense of those units on the contrary of the population is rural, we find that ( 33.5%) of the population is rural concentrated in the three units (the area Gharraf, Aldoaah, and Suq) in the census 1977, while (28.9)% in the Census 1987 concentrated in the (Center for the Elimination of Nasiriyah and the Centre for the Eradication Rifai and vine Bani Said) while the total descent (31.3)% in the three administrative units represented in the (center spend Rifai, Center for the Elimination Shatra, hand Gharraf), it demonstrates that more than a third of the rural population is concentrated in the three units at the expense of two thirds of them are concentrated in (16) and the administrative unit, may be due potential for agricultural soil and water resources and agricultural labor, which plays an active role in their deployment and concentration variation on the administrative units. 6. Managing mobility is still an impact, in contrast to the effective relative change of the administrative units, where inequality and bias in the provision of services and projects, economic development is still limited to centers without units respects. 7. Deterioration of the agricultural sector and the lack of active role because of the problems growing Kqlh water and salinity. It was a ruler to dispense with a lot of manpower, which has a search for employment opportunities in the areas and centers of other districts. 8. Ninths relative change in the period 1977-1987, more than the period 1987.1997. Evidence of change to the high proportion (70 125 and 44 108%) in central Nasiriyah, Shatra spend in the first period while the highest relative change of the second period in terms of victory and of (95.51%). The county-level relative change was 84.47% for the period 1977 to 1987. While fell to 63.28% in the period 1987 to 1997. A decline of 21.19% may be due in response to the State's policy of reducing the administrative and economic disparities and service in the province, which would lead to lower relative change in it. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 165 PDF Download: 108 |
||