The content of the speech in the Holy Quran Stylistic study | ||
Journal of The Thi Qar Arts | ||
Article 1, Volume 2, Issue 5, March 2012, Pages 41-52 | ||
Author | ||
dr. azhar ali yaseen | ||
Abstract | ||
After this break in Rehab gone along with the Koran, which steps in this research (the content of the speech in the Koran) received some of the observations and results, refer to the most important can be briefly as follows: - - This study was concerned with style methods of the Koran, not a style of discourse exclusively the content of the speech. The speech usually comes in verses two directions: first, the direct goal of the speech commands and prohibitions and the question and the appeal and pray and consciences of speech and so on, and indirect discourse represented by the symbol and pun and metaphor, and pay attention, and the consciences of backbiting and so on. As for the substance of the speech, we find that there is a rhetorical one (addressee - speaker) and (addressee - the recipient) and (subject or message) mixed with the two meanings, denote the first meaning of the phenomenon and direct the sign of the second meaning is implicitly referred to or Aamii them nodding because they are potential process on the substance of rhetoric, in the sense that one word here carries the meaning and against him, or significance of words and Migaerha showed little thing and the thing a lot, or indicate the part and the whole in the same context. - Linguists pointed to (the content of the speech) as a method of rhetorical methods of the Arab people, through the employment of words to denote more than one sense. Scholars also pointed to the significance of interpretation, in turn, the content of the speech because it raises a legitimate meaning of the compositions in a new indication or new legitimacy. - The structures in (the content of the speech in the Koran) is restricted and specific terms that a particular is (whit) and (hilum) and (Qitmeer) and (fuse) and (about) and (F) - and despite the fact that these vocalizations have been reported in other structures and contexts in the last verses in several places but it did not come a function of the content of the speech, this means that these words are in particular contexts. What matters here is not verbally, but in its content in your context. - Come wordy on the substance of the speech function on the thing and its opposite to the word (F) which indicates the prohibition on direct insult to parents and insulting little or a lot, but the word (quintals), which indicates little money or a lot, but the word (about), which indicates a partial place and kidney . This and that seemed to be more like contradistinction or so concluded, but he can not say that there is contradiction, because the contrast though word which carries meaning and against him but the context is likely a concerned only, and not both, while in (the content of the speech) Vallfez comes a potential meaning and against him in one context, because There are deliberate in a bilateral sense in these words derive the significance of evidence related to the text in agreement with the phrase of speech and a coalition with the intent of the speaker ... And God knows. And yet ... This is the most important findings put forward by research, proven by the study. And sorry that I missed something .. and reward hardworking suffices And ask God for success, and the last prayer that the Lord of the Worlds. | ||
Statistics Article View: 63 PDF Download: 16 |