Measurement and analysis of noise pollution in Al-shaheed Copper and Brass factories, Iraq. | ||
| Journal of University of Anbar for Pure Science | ||
| Article 11, Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2011, Pages 29-33 PDF (600.08 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37652/juaps.2011.44307 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Anmar D. Kusag* 1; Ismaeel A. Hirrat1; Salam K. Mousa2 | ||
| 1University of Anbar- College of Education for pure sciences. | ||
| 2University of Anbar- College of Arts.. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Industry workers suffer psychological and physical stress as well as hearing loss due to industrial noise. Although noise source control can be profound process sometimes, it would be the most effective way to eliminate noise level on source. Therefore, identifying dominant source of noise shall be the first step to overcome the noise problem in industry. This paper presents the noise pollution in Al-shaheed Copper and Brass factories in Iraq at 33°06ˉ04˭ longitude and 43°48ˉ50˭ altitude. The factories are staffed by 1700 workers for 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. This study depended on the maximum permissible occupational noise exposure limit of International Standards Organization (ISO) and Occupational Safety Health Act (OSHA) as a comparison reference. And proved that the half of the work sites in factories where unacceptable noise levels and all sites of comfort workers exceeded the limit of acceptable noise and the study also proved that the administration building factories sites within the levels of the noise surveys and administrative staff in safety from the impact of noise in factories. Also the Noise pollution has no effect on residential areas near the factories. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Noise pollution; Industrial noise; Industrial workrooms; Noise level | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Michel P., Serge A.G., 2008: Association of work-related accidents with noise exposure in the workplace and noise-induced hearing loss based on the experience of some 240,000 person-years of observation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 40, pp. 1644–1652.
[2] Edeltraut E., Frank R., 2005: Frequency-specific cochlear damage in guinea pig after exposure to different types of realistic industrial noise. Hearing Research, vol.201, pp. 90–98.
[3] Polyvios C. E., 2002: Industrial noise and its effects on human hearing. Applied Acoustics, vol. 63, pp. 35–42.
[4] H. O. Ahmed, J. H. Dennis, 2001: Occupational Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss of Workers in Two Plants in Eastern Saudi Arabia Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 371–380
[5] International Standards Organization, 1971: Assessment of Occupational Noise Exposure for Hearing Conversation Purpose. ISO recommendation R-1999.
[6] Department of Employment, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London, UK: 1972. Code of Practice for Reducing the Exposure of Employed Persons to Noise.
[7] Shaikh G.H., 1999: Occupational noise exposure limits for developing countries. Applied Acoustics, vol. 57, pp. 89±92.
[8] The Working Environment Act, Law No. 681. Denmark, 1975.
[9] Statutory Instrument No. 235, Factories Act No. 10. Republic of Ireland, 1975.
[10] Hay B. 1975: Occupational noise exposure - the laws in the EEC, Sweden, Norway, Australia, Canada, and the U.S.A. Applied Acoustics.
[11] Hassal JR, Zaveri K. 1988: Acoustic Noise Measurements, 5th. Edition Denmark, Bruel & Kjaer, p.65.
[12] Occupational Safety and Health Standards of Japan, 1983: Federal Register, Vol. 48, No. 46. pp. 7938±7985.
[13] US Department of Labour, 1974: Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Vol. 39, No. 125, Part II.
[14] Environment Protection Authority, 2000: NSW Industrial Noise Policy.
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 178 PDF Download: 78 |
||