The role of reason in the development of an analytical study of legal provisions | ||
| CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC STUDIENS MAGAZINE | ||
| Article 1, Volume 3, Issue 5, March 2012, Pages 1-16 PDF (0 K) | ||
| Author | ||
| Plasm Aziz Shabib Zamili | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In the name of God Doxology Lord of the Worlds, prayer and peace be upon Muhammad and his pure. And after Of the mind a prominent place in the monotheistic religions, it is the first creature created from the spiritual, as Imam Jafar bin Muhammad Sadiq (that God created the mind, the first creation of the spiritual), and make the mind the focus of reward and punishment, as stated in the Hadith (that God first created the mind and said to him, turned to accept, and then said: Vodber gone, he said beware of the commander and you finished, and your and your Athib punish). The inner mind that guides the Apostle to the virtues of human acts, as is the Prophet and the Prophet peace be upon them virtual apostle who is the divine messages. And made the heavenly religions, especially the Islamic Sharia in the health condition of the mind of transactions and acts of worship and rhythms and judgments, and do not mind it does not cost the worship, it is not valid transaction, nor is it the rhythm, it does not apply some of the provisions Kalgosas example. Were received too many stories in this section, and told by more modern, has gathered sufficient assets in Kulayni entire folder. I think that most Imami mind a source of legislation, and after this statement. It appears through research that the governance of reason to be agreed upon in the resources and different in the other, so it can be said not to differences in the governance of reason to improve things and Taqbihaa, as well as to establish the origins of religion, as well as the mind in the arbitration systems on public and private life. As well as no different in the realization of good governance of the mind is self-employed mental health, even after they have Ksmoh to the independent mentality, namely: what I got from introductions mentality only, and is independent mentality, namely: what I got from the introductions to the mentality and other non-mental, such as the introduction of duty, and the subject of the parts, and Almlazmat mental, and the requirement is to discourage private or public against him to say them, and understand Dalalt operative concept and other contextual significance. And also agreed to recognize the reason for the job process when the text as in the patent and mental reserves, as well as the rest of the assets of mental process. They also agreed that the judgment of the mind is different from the rule of the wise. As for what differed concerning it, is: Is that the mind in mental self-employed and can understand the rule of God and his goal is not realistic in the text? The answer to that, we say: It was agreed Muslims on the inability of the mind to comprehend all the provisions of the law, rather it is necessary to communicate through the revelation by the apostles of the prophets, especially in the worship and the provisions of the transactions and other provisions, and differed in the sense of what is not a text in which there are three points: First: the view of the Ash'aris; is that the mind can not understand God's judgment, but is limited to that reported by the prophets, but they went over it, and said that the mind can not recognize good things and ugliness, and that is classed as the street is good and what is reprehensible is ugly . And seem This is a clear nullification, because it is contrary to the words of God (that God commands justice and charity, and forbids indecency and evil) If it were not these concepts are known and aware before the legislation needed to the statement, then the command them and forbidding them, did not prove it. The second is that the mind understands the rule of God, as well as aware of good things and ugliness, but other infallible, and therefore unreliable, and this is the view of some of the people of the modern public and chroniclers of the front. This view is also wrong, because he looked at the realization of reason is not abstract concepts and to the District, which is useful here is the mind that looks for the abstract concepts of abstract and non-college credibility as we shall see. Third: that the mind is aware of the rule of God, and is aware of good things and ugliness, as well as understand practical function of the taxpayer if there is text, this is right, and the view of most of the front and isolationists. Count, but the mind and the rational evidence of legislative resources at the front, as they believed that the mind is aware of the detector and the provisions of the law with no text in it. But what is the mind that understands the rule of God? What is the ruling perceived? The answer is that to be of the mind here is the abstract mind, and is affected by the senses, and deposits the mind of religion and doctrine and practice and the environment, which is the mind that sits in the Muslim infidel, and the insured reprobate, the learner and others, and women and men, which detects and understands concepts, college naked, Kadrack good justice and injustice, ugliness, so they said: The good and ugliness Aklaan. The concepts of partial credibility is abstract can not be the mind recognized only with the help of the senses, and thus differs from the approach mental when Imami-curricular mental to Abu Hanifa and the rest of the doctrines of the Muslims, where it was decided in their method of work measurement and plaudits and interests of sending and others, and adopted in the authoritative of these concepts on the mind is abstract , and the user to grasp the concepts of partial, since it is based on the senses are subject to error, it is presumptive; because it does not depend on the mind the abstract, but depends on the mind of industrious affected by the senses, and stocks of mind customary and religious and personal matters, but understanding is right, therefore, forbade the people of the house : work for such a conclusion, and what is happening from the abstract mind, who went Twelver Imami did not respond to authoritative it is forbidden. We say here that the mind understands the provisions and discovered, not that he judged them, but to discover the rule is located, which is consistent with common sense, has left God revealed some of the provisions to reason and only this, but came by after Atdhaha by the mind, be sentenced indicative and not constitutive. After this statement we say research has included an introduction and four sections: Prompt of the first: to ensure the meaning of rational evidence and location and purpose. The second section includes a directory partitions, mental, and is divided into independent women's mental and mental self-employed, and to the work of reason and theoretical reason. The third topic: words in the directory includes mental. Section IV contains authoritative rational evidence. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 55 PDF Download: 25 |
||