Abdulrahman, H., Joda, A. (2023). Evaluation of Risk Factors for Development of Stoma Related Complications in Patient with Anorectal Malformation. Alustath, 22(4), 417-425. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2023.182284
Humam Isam Abdulrahman; Ali Egab Joda. "Evaluation of Risk Factors for Development of Stoma Related Complications in Patient with Anorectal Malformation". Alustath, 22, 4, 2023, 417-425. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2023.182284
Abdulrahman, H., Joda, A. (2023). 'Evaluation of Risk Factors for Development of Stoma Related Complications in Patient with Anorectal Malformation', Alustath, 22(4), pp. 417-425. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2023.182284
Abdulrahman, H., Joda, A. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Development of Stoma Related Complications in Patient with Anorectal Malformation. Alustath, 2023; 22(4): 417-425. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.2023.182284

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Development of Stoma Related Complications in Patient with Anorectal Malformation

Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal
Volume 22, Issue 4, October 2023, Pages 417-425    PDF (249 K)
Document Type: Review Article
DOI: 10.52573/ipmj.2023.182284
Authors
Humam Isam Abdulrahman* 1; Ali Egab Joda2
1Pediatric Surgery, Al-Turath University College, Baghdad, Iraq
2Pediatric Surgery, College of Medicine, Al-Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Colostomy in patient with ARM has complications. There are some risk factors have impact on complications development.
OBJECTIVE:
Predict risk factors for development of stoma complications in ARM patients.
METHODS:
A prospective study conducted on neonates and infants with ARM who underwent colostomy at                     the department of pediatric surgery - central Child Teaching Hospital/Baghdad-Iraq from January/2019 till January/2021, searching for stoma complications and evaluating the effect of several variables                   on stoma morbidity.
RESULTS:
A total (64) patients, the most common associated anomaly was cardiac one. The mean operative time was 69.8 minutes. The mean stoma duration was (9.7) months. The postoperative stoma care was good in (59.4%) and poor in (40.6%) cases.
54.7% of patients had complications. The most common were skin excoriation. Mortality was reported in two cases (3.1%).
CONCLUSION:
Colostomy Creation carries a lot of complications. Variables of sex, associated anomaly, operative time, stoma care, and stoma duration were determinant of morbidity while age, weight, type and level of stoma have no significant associations. Loop type has shorter operative time but higher incidence of UTI than divided one. Prolapse of stoma was not related to stoma type.
 
Keywords
anorectal malformations; stomas; complication; risk factor
References
  1. Wilkins, S., Peña, A. The role of colostomy in the management of anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int, 1988; 3:105–9.
  2. Chowdhary SK, Chalapathi G, Narasimhan KL, Samujh R, Mahajan JK, Menon P, Rao KL. An audit of neonatal colostomy for high anorectal malformation: the developing world perspective. Pediatr Surg Int. 2004;20:111-13.
  3. Levitt, M.A., Peña, A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2007; 2: 33.
  4. Almosallam OI, Aseeri A, Shanafey SA. Outcome of loop versus divided colostomy in the management of anorectal malformations. Ann Saudi Med. 2016;36:352-55.
  5. Pena A, Migotto-Krieger M, Levitt MA. Colostomy in anorectal malformations: a procedure with serious but preventable complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:748-56.
  6. Demirogullari B, Yilmaz Y, Yildiz GE, Ozen IO, Karabulut R, Turkyilmaz Z, Sonmez K, Basaklar AC, Kale N. Ostomy complicatıons in patients with anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27:1075-78.
  7. Mullassery D, Iacona R, Cross K, Blackburn S, Kiely E, Eaton S, Curry J, De Coppi P. Loop colostomies are safe in anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53:2170-73.
  8. Patwardhan N, Kiely E.M, Drake D.P, Spitz L, Pierro A. Colostomy for anorectal anomalies: High incidence of complications. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:795-98.
  9. Liechty ST, Barnhart DC, Huber JT, Zobell S, Rollins MD. The morbidity of a divided stoma compared to a loop colostomy in patients with anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:107-10.
  10. van den Hondel D, Sloots C, Meeussen C, Wijnen R. To split or not to split: colostomy complications for anorectal malformations or hirschsprung disease: a single center experience and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2014;24:61-69.
  11. Çiğdem, M.K., Onen, A., Duran, H. et al. The mechanical complications of colostomy in infants and children: analysis of 473 cases of a single center. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22, 671–676.
  12. Kureel SN, Tandon RK. Anorectal Malformations:Diagnosis and Management. In: Gupta D (editor). Pediatric Surgery Diagnosis and Management 1st Ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2008:788-815.
  13. Joda A. et al. Complications of Stoma in Patients with Anorectal Malformation. Iraqi Med J 2017; 63 : 29-38.
  14. Youssef F, Arbash G, Puligandla PS, Baird RJ. Loop versus divided colostomy for the management of anorectal malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52:783-90.
  15. Divarci E, Ergun O. General complications after surgery for anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020;36:431-45.
  16. Chirdan LB, Uba FA, Ameh EA, Mshelbwala PM. Colostomy for high anorectal malformation: an evaluation of morbidity and mortality in a developing country. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24:407-10.
  17. Banu T, Karim A, Adel MG et al. Multicenter Study of 342 Anorectal Malformation Patients: Age, Gender, Krickenbeck Subtypes, and Associated Anomalies. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2020;30:447-51.
  18. Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A. Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:834-8.
  19. de Blaauw I, Wijers CH, Schmiedeke E, Holland-Cunz S, Gamba P, Marcelis CL, Reutter H, Aminoff D, Schipper M, Schwarzer N, Grasshoff-Derr S, Midrio P, Jenetzky E, van Rooij IA. First results of a European multi-center registry of patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:2530-35.
  20. Minneci Peter C. et al. Screening practices and associated anomalies in infants with anorectal malformations: Results from the Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53:1163 – 67.
  21. Nah SA, Ong CC, Lakshmi NK, Yap TL, Jacobsen AS, Low Y. Anomalies associated with anorectal malformations according to the Krickenbeck anatomic classification. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 ;47:2273-78.
  22. Gauderer M. Stomas of the Small and Large Intestine. In: Judith Fletcher, editor. Pediatric Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: ELSEVIER;2012:1235-45.
  23. Zamil A L, Radhi O A K, Hasan HS. Colostomy in Anorectal Malformation and Hirschsprung’s Disease in Infants and Children. Eur Sci Journal, ESJ 2018;14:464.
  24. Oda O, Davies D, Colapinto K, Gerstle JT. Loop versus divided colostomy for the management of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:87-90; discussion 90.
  25. Yesildag E, Muniz RM. Buyukunal SN: How did the surgeons treat neonates with imperforate anus in the eighteenth century? Pediatr Surg Int 2010; 26:1149–58.
  26. Bhama AR, Batool F, Collins SD, Ferraro J, Cleary RK. Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Diverting Loop Ileostomy Takedown. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:2048–55.
  27. Slater R. Paediatric stoma care: surgery and management. Gastrointest Nurs.2011;9:20–26.
  28. Waller M. Paediatric stoma care nursing in the UK and Ireland. Br J Nurs. 2008;17:S25-9.
 

Statistics
Article View: 64
PDF Download: 31


Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus.com