Turkish military interventions in northern of Iraq and their justifications (Legal analytical study) | ||
| Journal of Anbar University for Law and Political Sciences | ||
| Volume 13, Issue: 2 part 2, December 2023, Pages 940-980 PDF (876.78 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37651/aujlps.2023.143650.1087 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Sara Ayad Alazawi* 1; Mahmood Khaleel Jafer2 | ||
| 1لا اعمل | ||
| 2college of law university of Baghdad | ||
| Abstract | ||
| When the Cold War ended, many military interventions appeared in international practices under many names and with different justifications, in order to give them international legitimacy. It is no secret to say that most members of the international community know that these interventions are nothing but aggression without the slightest doubt, regardless of the arguments put forward by the militarily intervening countries, as long as they lead to flagrant violations of international norms and the established principles contained in the Charter of the United Nations, especially what was included in its preamble, which states: It expressed humanity's rejection of the use of force in international relations. Our study represents a serious attempt to review the facts and foundations upon which the practice of international military intervention was based and then analyze those foundations, taking the situation between Iraq and Turkey as a model for the study. If we were biased in proving the illegitimacy of the Turkish military intervention despite the evidence presented, then we dealt with the study of these interventions and their evidence with a deep analysis in which we take the reader to international precedents in which international positions concluded with the illegitimacy of military intervention based on similar justified evidence. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| military intervention؛; aggression؛; armed groups؛ ؛؛; preventive legitimate defence | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 2,158 PDF Download: 26 |
||