Ahmed, L., Mohammed, A. (2023). A Critical Review on Relation Between Non-Destructive Tests and Pull-out Load of Imbedded Anchor Bolts in Concrete. Alustath, 3(3), 145-171.
Lawand Dyari Ahmed; azad Abdulqadir Mohammed. "A Critical Review on Relation Between Non-Destructive Tests and Pull-out Load of Imbedded Anchor Bolts in Concrete". Alustath, 3, 3, 2023, 145-171.
Ahmed, L., Mohammed, A. (2023). 'A Critical Review on Relation Between Non-Destructive Tests and Pull-out Load of Imbedded Anchor Bolts in Concrete', Alustath, 3(3), pp. 145-171.
Ahmed, L., Mohammed, A. A Critical Review on Relation Between Non-Destructive Tests and Pull-out Load of Imbedded Anchor Bolts in Concrete. Alustath, 2023; 3(3): 145-171.

A Critical Review on Relation Between Non-Destructive Tests and Pull-out Load of Imbedded Anchor Bolts in Concrete

Kerbala Journal for Engineering Sciences
Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2023, Pages 145-171    PDF (1.46 M)
Document Type: Review Article
Authors
Lawand Dyari Ahmed* ; azad Abdulqadir Mohammed
Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Sulaimani
Abstract
Anchor bolts are widely utilized in numerous industries, including mechanical, building construction, and mining sectors. Anchor bolt uses range from the installation of permanent objects including hybrid constructions, illumination poles, and directional signs to the installation of temporary structures, such as the construction of formwork and safety netting. Several varieties of destructive testing instruments exist in the construction industry for determining the load-bearing capacity of concrete anchors. However, there has been a lack of attention to the development of non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques for the estimation of pull-out loads. This study highlights the limited research on evaluating the pull-out strength of embedded steel bolts in concrete using non-destructive tests and illustrates their relationship with each other. This critical review has demonstrated that embedded concrete anchor pull-out strength depends on alignment, embedment length, anchor bolt diameter, micro flaws, and bolt geometry. The embedment length of anchor bolts contributes much more to the improvement in pull-out strength than the bolt diameter. The ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) assessment and the Schmidt hammer (SH) assessment can be successfully used to monitor the quality of embedded anchor bolts in normal-strength concrete structures by identifying defective anchor bolts with porous bonds. Anchor bolts with insufficient bonding were found to have a lower rebound value and a prolonged ultrasonic pulse time of transit.
Keywords
Anchor bolt,,; ,،Pull-out strength,,; ,،Non-Destructive test (NDT),,; ,،Schmidt hammer (SH),,; ,،Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV)
References
  • Lu, C., & Sonoda, Y. (2021). An analytical study on the pull-out strength of anchor bolts embedded in concrete members by SPH method. Applied Sciences, 11(18), 8526.
  • Shafei, E., & Tariverdilo, S. (2021, December). Seismic pullout behavior of cast-in-place anchor bolts embedded in plain concrete: Damage plasticity based analysis. In Structures(Vol. 34, pp. 479-486). Elsevier.
  • Saleem, M., & Nasir, M. (2016). Bond evaluation of steel bolts for concrete subjected to impact loading. Materials and Structures, 49, 3635-3646.
  • Saleem, M., Al-Kutti, W. A., Al-Akhras, N. M., & Haider, H. (2016). Nondestructive testing procedure to evaluate the load-carrying capacity of concrete anchors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(5), 04015104.
  • Saleem, M., & Hosoda, A. (2021). Latin hypercube sensitivity analysis and non-destructive test to evaluate the pull-out strength of steel anchor bolts embedded in concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 290, 123256.
  • Saleem, M., & Tsubaki, T. (2010). Multi-layer model for pull-out behavior of post-installed anchor.  FRAMCOS-7, Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures, AEDIFICATIO publishers, Germany, 2, 823-830.
  • Tsubaki, T., Ihara, T., & Yoshida, M. (1992). Statistical variation and modeling of drying shrinkage of concrete.  of the Japan Concrete Institute, 14, 123-130.
  • Xiang, N., & Alam, M. S. (2019). Comparative seismic fragility assessment of an existing isolated continuous bridge retrofitted with different energy dissipation devices. Journal of bridge engineering, 24(8), 04019070.
  • Yu, P., Manalo, A., Ferdous, W., Salih, C., Abousnina, R., Heyer, T., & Schubel, P. (2021). Failure analysis and the effect of material properties on the screw pull-out behaviour of polymer composite sleeper materials. Engineering Failure Analysis, 128, 105577.
  • Sharda, A., Manalo, A., Ferdous, W., Bai, Y., Nicol, L., Mohammed, A., & Benmokrane, B. (2021). Axial compression behaviour of all-composite modular wall system. Composite Structures, 268, 113986.
  • Yuan, C., Fan, L., Cui, J. F., & Wang, W. J. (2020). Numerical simulation of the supporting effect of anchor rods on layered and nonlayered roof rocks. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, 1-14.
  • Hashimoto, J., & Takiguchi, K. (2004). Experimental study on pullout strength of anchor bolt with an embedment depth of 30 mm in concrete under high temperature. Nuclear engineering and design, 229(2-3), 151-163.
  • Munemoto, S., & Sonoda, Y. (2017). Experimental analysis of anchor bolt in concrete under the pull-out loading. Procedia Engineering, 171, 926-933.
  • Richardson, A. E., Dawson, S., Campbell, L., Moore, G., & Mc Kenzie, C. (2019). Temperature related pull-out performance of chemical anchor bolts in fibre concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 196, 478-484.
  • Yilmaz, S., Özen, M. A., & Yardim, Y. (2013). Tensile behavior of post-installed chemical anchors embedded to low strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 861-866.
  • Nilforoush, R., Nilsson, M., & Elfgren, L. (2017). Experimental evaluation of tensile behaviour of single cast-in-place anchor bolts in plain and steel fibre-reinforced normal-and high-strength concrete. Engineering Structures, 147, 195-206.
  • Eligehausen, R., Bouska, P., Cervenka, V., & Pukl, R. (1992). Size Effect of the Concrete Cone failure Load of Anchor Bolts, FramCoS I.
  • Bajer, M., & Barnat, J. (2012). The glue–concrete interface of bonded anchors. Construction and building materials, 34, 267-274.
  • Liu, Q., Chai, J., Chen, S., Zhang, D., Yuan, Q., & Wang, S. (2020). Monitoring and correction of the stress in an anchor bolt based on Pulse Pre‐Pumped Brillouin Optical Time Domain Analysis. Energy Science & Engineering, 8(6), 2011-2023.
  • Delhomme, F., Debicki, G., & Chaib, Z. (2010). Experimental behaviour of anchor bolts under pullout and relaxation tests. Construction and Building Materials, 24(3), 266-274.
  • Nilforoush, R., Nilsson, M., Elfgren, L., Ožbolt, J., Hofmann, J., & Eligehausen, R. (2017). Tensile capacity of anchor bolts in uncracked concrete: Influence of member thickness and anchor’s head size. ACI Structural Journal, 114(6), 1519-1530.
  • Mallée, R., & Eligehausen, R. (2013). Design of fastenings for use in concrete: the CEN/TS 1992-4 provisions. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Eligehausen, R., Mallée, R., & Silva, J. F. (2006). Anchorage in concrete construction(Vol. 10). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Zamora, N. A., Cook, R. A., Konz, R. C., & Consolazio, G. R. (2003). Behavior and design of single, headed and unheaded, grouted anchors under tensile load. Structural Journal, 100(2), 222-230.
  • Fuchs, W., Eligehausen, R., & Breen, J. E. (1995). Concrete capacity design (CCD) approach for fastening to concrete. Structural Journal, 92(1), 73-94.
  • Cook, R. A., Kunz, J., Fuchs, W., & Konz, R. C. (1998). Behavior and design of single adhesive anchors under tensile load in uncracked concrete. Structural Journal, 95(1), 9-26.
  • Eligehausen, R., & Balogh, T. (1995). Behavior of fasteners loaded in tension in cracked reinforced concrete. Structural Journal, 92(3), 365-379.
  • Takiguchi, K., Harada, R., & Ishizeki, K. (1999). Pull out strength of an anchor bolt embedded in cracked concrete.
  • Wang, D., Wu, D., He, S., Zhou, J., & Ouyang, C. (2015). Behavior of post-installed large-diameter anchors in concrete foundations. Construction and Building Materials, 95, 124-132.
  • Ishibashi, T., & Tsukishima, D. (2009). Seismic damage of and seismic rehabilitation techniques for railway reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 7(3), 287-296.
  • Satoh, A., Takeda, K., & Murakami, K. (2019). FEM analysis on combined bond-cone fracture of a post-installed adhesive anchor filled with UHPFRC. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 100, 46-54.
  • Obata, M., Inoue, M., & Goto, Y. (1998). The failure mechanism and the pull-out strength of a bond-type anchor near a free edge. Mechanics of materials, 28(1-4), 113-122.
  • Soparat, P., & Nanakorn, P. (2008). Analysis of anchor bolt pullout in concrete by the element-free Galerkin method. Engineering structures, 30(12), 3574-3586.
  • Lu, J., Zhang, Y., Muhammad, H., Chen, Z., Xiao, Y., & Ye, B. (2019). 3D analysis of anchor bolt pullout in concrete materials using the non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 207, 68-85.
  • Saleem, M. (2020). Assessing the load carrying capacity of concrete anchor bolts using non-destructive tests and artificial multilayer neural network. Journal of Building Engineering, 30, 101260.
  • Saleem, M. (2018). Evaluating the pull-out load capacity of steel bolt using Schmidt hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity test.  Eng Mech, 65(5), 601-609.
  • Shull, P. J. (2002). Nondestructive evaluation: theory, techniques, and applications. CRC press.
  • Chang, P. C., & Liu, S. C. (2003). Recent research in nondestructive evaluation of civil infrastructures. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 15(3), 298-304.
  • Schmidt, E. (1951). A non-destructive concrete tester. Concrete, 59, 34-35.
  • Miller, R. P. (1965). Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Cargill, J. S., & Shakoor, A. (1990, December). Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. In International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts(Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 495-503). Pergamon.
  • Yurdakul, M., Ceylan, H., & Akdas, H. (2011, June). A predictive model for uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks from Schmidt hardness. In 45th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. OnePetro.
  • Torabi, S. R., Ataei, M., & Javanshir, M. (2011). Application of Schmidt rebound number for estimating rock strength under specific geological conditions. Journal of Mining and Environment, 1(2).
  • Brozovsky, J., & Zach, J. (2011, October). Influence of surface preparation method on the concrete rebound number obtained from impact hammer test. In Pan American Conference for NDT(Vol. 6, No. 10).
  • Liu, J. C., Sue, M. L., & Kou, C. H. (2009). Estimating the strength of concrete using surface rebound value and design parameters of concrete material. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 12(1), 1-7.
  • Katalin, S. (2013). Rebound surface hardness and related properties of concrete(Doctoral dissertation, Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. thesis, Budapest Univ. of Technology and Economics, Dept. of Construction Materials and Engineering, Budapest, Hungary).
  • Sharma, P. K., Khandelwal, M., & Singh, T. N. (2011). A correlation between Schmidt hammer rebound numbers with impact strength index, slake durability index and P-wave velocity. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 100, 189-195.
  • Mutlib, N. K., Baharom, S. B., El‐Shafie, A., & Nuawi, M. Z. (2016). Ultrasonic health monitoring in structural engineering: buildings and bridges. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 23(3), 409-422.
  • Li, J., Gao, X., & Zhang, P. (2007). Experimental investigation on the bond of reinforcing bars in high performance concrete under cyclic loading. Materials and structures, 40, 1027-1044.
  • Yalciner, H., Eren, O., & Sensoy, S. (2012). An experimental study on the bond strength between reinforcement bars and concrete as a function of concrete cover, strength and corrosion level. Cement and Concrete Research, 42(5), 643-655.
  • Desnerck, P., Lees, J. M., & Morley, C. T. (2015). Bond behaviour of reinforcing bars in cracked concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 126-136.
  • Inadsu, K., Tamura, T., & Nakamura, H. (2010). Study on the Cracking Occurrence Prediction of Civil Engineering Structures Using a Neural Network (In Japanese). 65th Annu.  Japan Soc. Civ. Eng, 403, 1-3.
  • Ongpeng, J., Soberano, M., Oreta, A., & Hirose, S. (2017). Artificial neural network model using ultrasonic test results to predict compressive stress in concrete. Computers and Concrete, 19(1), 59-68.
Statistics
Article View: 128
PDF Download: 168


Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus.com