Assessment of Morphometric and Hypsometric Analysis of the Ruste Basin Using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System Techniques | ||
| Kirkuk University Journal For Agricultural Sciences | ||
| Volume 14, Issue 4, December 2023, Pages 1-19 PDF (1.9 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.58928/ku23.14401 | ||
| Author | ||
| Kamyar M. Mohammed* | ||
| Department of Soil and Water, College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Iraq. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| A basin’s characteristics and features need to be comprehended completely by conducting morphometric analysis, such as evaluating the basin’s size, form, and surface features, to estimate floods and erosion rates properly. The main objective of this investigation is to evaluate morphometric measures and hypsometric analysis of Erbil’s Ruste Basin employing remote sensing and geographical information system methods. To investigate the significant tributaries of the selected area, the hydrology tool within the Spatial Analysis Tools of ArcGIS, version 10.7, was utilized to define the basin boundaries, map the drainage networks, and obtain topographic data. The findings of the linear morphometric parameters revealed that the logarithmic relationship between stream orders and stream numbers was negative. The difference in stream order and number seen in the watershed is due to topography and bedrock influence. The results also showed a negative correlation between stream length and stream order, and a coefficient of determination of 0.972, which indicates that the basin is made of low-permeability formation and subsoil materials. Considering the areal morphometric parameters, the circularity ratio, elongation ratio, and form factor are 0.594, 0.853 and 0.572, respectively, suggested a semi-circular shape. A drainage density value of 2.259 km-1 showed that the Ruste Basin is a basin with steeply to very steeply sloping hilly terrain with varying plant covering. Furthermore, the Ruste Basin has high relief and slope with a relief ratio of 0.151 and basin relief of 2.576 km, both of which imply that it has a steep slope with high erosive force, limited infiltration, and a high runoff rate. Ruste Basin’s ruggedness number was 5.819, indicating that it has badlands topography. The average hypsometric integral was 0.467, denoting a mature basin featuring S-shaped hypsometric curves. In conclusion, the results showed that analysis of morphometric parameters and hypsometric integral and curve provides us with a notion to basin characterization and guidance to making appropriate decisions to establish effective actions to sustainable water and soil conservation and natural resources management through applying water harvesting methods, check dams, and bench terraces. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| DEM,,; ,،Hypsometry integral,,; ,،Morphometric analysis,,; ,،Ruste basin | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Sangle, A.S. and Yannawar, P.L., 2014. Morphometric analysis of watershed using GIS and RS: a review. Int J Eng Res Technol, 3(11), p.499. https://www.ijert.org/morphometric-analysis-of-watershed-using-gis-and-rs-a-review#:~:text=DOI%20%3A%2010.17577/IJERTV3IS110546.
[2] Prakash, K., Rawat, D. and Singh, S., 2019. Morphometric analysis using SRTM and GIS in syn-ergy with depiction: a case study of the Karmanasa River basin, North central India, Journal of Applied Water Sciences, 9 (13), doi: 10.1007/s13201-018-0887-3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-018-0887-3.
[3] Sebastian, M., Jayaraman, V. and Chandrasekhar, M.G., 1995. Space technology applications for sustainable development of watersheds. Publications & Public Relations Unit, ISRO Headquarters. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265854011_Space_Technology_for_Sustainable_Development_-_Vision_2020.
[4] Ashwini, B. Avinash, G., Shambhavi, B. N., Vignesh, V. and Gowda, B. N. 2021. Morphometric and hypsometric analysis of lokapavani river basin using arcgis. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT). https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2108212.pdf.
[5] Parvez, M.B. and Inayathulla, M., 2019. Morphometry, hypsometry analysis and runoff estimation of Aam Talab watershed Raichur, Karnataka. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 5(3), p.1713. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333704843_Morphometry_Hypsometry_Analysis_and_Runoff_Estimation_of_Aam_Talab_Watershed_Raichur_Karnataka.
[6] Sutradhar, H., 2020. Assessment of drainage morphometry and watersheds prioritization of Siddheswari River Basin, Eastern India. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 48(4), p.627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01108-5.
[7] Khan, I., Bali, R., Agarwal, K.K., Kumar, D. and Singh, S.K., 2021. Morphometric analysis of Parvati Basin, NW Himalaya: a remote sensing and GIS based approach. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 97, p.165. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12594-021-1648-8.
[8] Strahler, A.N., 1964. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. Handbook of applied hydrology.
[9] Clarke, J. I. "Morphometry from maps. Essays in geomorphology." (1996): 235-274. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1152655.
[10] Gardiner V, 1990. Drainage Basin Morphometry. In: Goudie, A., Ed., Geomorphological Techniques, Unwin Hyman, London, p.71. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1749504#:~:text=DOI%3A%2010.4236/jgis.2022.144019.
[11] Ritter DF, Kochel RC, Miller JR (2002) Process geomorphology. McGraw Hill, Boston. https://www.amazon.com/Process-Geomorphology-Dale-F-Ritter/dp/1577666690.
[12] Weissel, J.K., Pratson, L.F. and Malinverno, A., 1994. The length‐scaling properties of topography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 99(B7), p.13997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JB00130.
[13] Hurtrez, J.E., Lucazeau, F., Lavé, J. and Avouac, J.P., 1999. Investigation of the relationships between basin morphology, tectonic uplift, and denudation from the study of an active fold belt in the Siwalik Hills, central Nepal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B6), p.12779. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JB900098.
[14] Strahler, A.N., 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geological society of America bulletin, 63(11), p.1117. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1952GSAB...63.1117S/doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2.
[15] Hussein, M. H., Kariem, T.H. & Raddad, A.H. (1989) Runoff and erosion analyses for a hilly area in northern Iraq. Proc. International Workshop on Conservation Farming on Hillslopes, Taichung, Taiwan, 20-29 March.
[16] Sulaiman, A.H. and Abdullah, Z.A., Empirical formula for determining bench terraces spacing In Duhok Governorate. Volume 17 December Number, P.23.
[17] Assaf, S. M. 2015. Design of terrace spacing in Shaqlawa District. A thesis submitted to the council of the college of Agriculture Salahaddin University-Erbil in partial fulfillment of master degree in soil conservation.
[18] Murthy, K.S.R., 2000. Ground water potential in a semi-arid region of Andhra Pradesh-a geographical information system approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(9), p.1867. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311600209788
[19] Magesh, N.S., Chandrasekar, N. and Soundranayagam, J.P., 2012. Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. Geoscience frontiers, 3(2), p.189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.10.007.
[20] Paulinus, U.U., Ifedilichukwu, N.G., Ahamefula, A.C., Iheanyichukwu, O.A., Theophilus, E.T. and Edet, I.G., 2016. Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Oguta and environs, southeastern Nigeria using GIS and remote sensing data. Journal of Geosciences, 4(2), p.21.
[21] Sissakian, V.K. and Fouad, S.F., 2014. Geological Map of Sulaimaniyah Quadrangle, scale 1: 250 000. Iraq Geological Survey Publications, Baghdad, Iraq. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5109.0642.
[22] Horton, R.E., 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological society of America bulletin, 56(3), p.275. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2.
[23] Schumm, S.A., 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological society of America bulletin, 67(5), p.597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606.
[24] Strahler, A.N., 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 38(6), p.913. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913.
[25] Mohammed, K.M. and Karim, T.H., 2020b. Models to predict slope length from other watershed attributes. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 51(4). https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51i4.1081.
[26] Rawat, U., Awasthi, A., Gupta, D.S., Paul, R.S. and Tripathi, S., 2017. Morphometric analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the Bagain River Basin, Bundelkhand Region, India. Indian J. Sci. Technol, 10(10). https://indjst.org/articles/morphometric-analysis-using-remote-sensing-and-gis-techniques-in-the-bagain-river-basin-bundelkhand-region-india.
[27] Faniran A., 1968. The index of drainage intensity: a provisional new drainage factor. Austr J Sci 31(9), p.326. https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=GEODEBRGM6918018443#:~:text=http%3A//pascal%2Dfrancis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php%3Faction%3DgetRecordDetail%26idt%3DGEODEBRGM6918018443.
[28] Miller, V. C. 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Proj. NR 389-402. Technical report 3. Columbia University. Department of Geology. ONR, New York. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1957JG.....65..112P/doi:10.1086/626413.
[29] Sharma, S.A., 2014. Morphometrical analysis of Imphal River basin using GIS. International Journal of Geology, Earth & Environmental Sciences2014, 4(2), p.138-144.
[30] Ali, K., Bajracharya, R.M., Sitaula, B.K., Raut, N. and Koirala, H.L., 2017. Morphometric analysis of Gilgit river basin in mountainous region of Gilgit-Baltistan Province, Northern Pakistan. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5(07), p.70. http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=77652
[31] Chitra, C., Alaguraja, P., Ganeshkumari, K., Yuvaraj, D. and Manivel, M., 2011. Watershed characteristics of Kundah sub basin using remote sensing and GIS techniques. International Journal of geomatics and geosciences, 2(1), p.311.
[32] Dubey, S.K., Sharma, D. and Mundetia, N., 2015. Morphometric analysis of the Banas River Basin using geographical information system, Rajasthan, India. Hydrology, 3(5), p.47. https//:doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20150305.11. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20150305.11.
[33] Choudhari, K., Panigrahi, B. and Paul, J.C., 2014. Morphometric analysis of Kharlikani watershed in Odisha, India using spatial information technology. International journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 4(4), p.661 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Morphometric-analysis-of-Kharlikani-watershed-in-Choudhari-Panigrahi/617845410d2efd670ee26351a961ad78940c5185. .
[34] Nagaraju, D., Siddalingamurthy, D., Balasubramanian, S., Lakshmamma, A. and Sumithra, S., 2015. Morphometric analysis of Byramangala Watershed, Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 5(3). https://www.geospatialworld.net/article/study-of-watershed-characteristics-using-google-elevation-service/.
[35] Sethupathi, A.S., Narasimhan, C.L., Vasanthamohan, V. and Mohan, S.P., 2011. Prioritization of miniwatersheds based on Morphometric Analysis using Remote Sensing and GIS techniques in a draught prone Bargur–Mathur subwatersheds, Ponnaiyar River basin, India. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(2), p.403. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236329783_Prioritization_of_miniwatersheds_based_on_Morphometric_Analysis_using_Remote_Sensing_and_GIS_techniques_in_a_drought_prone_Bargur-Mathur_subwatersheds_Ponnaiyar_River_basin_India.
[36] Huda, E.A., 2017. Morphometric characteristics of Dikrong River catchment in the foot-hills of Arunachal Himalayas. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(7), p.51. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.%2022%20Issue7/Version-13/H2207135160.pdf.
[37] Hlaing, K.T., Haruyama, S. and Aye, M.M., 2008. Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, 2, p.465. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11707-008-0048-3.
[38] Adhikari, S., 2020. Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin: A study of Ghatganga River, Bajhang District, Nepal. The Geographic Base, 7, p.127. https://doi.org/10.3126/tgb.v7i0.34280.
[39] Kale, V.S. and Gupta, A., 2001. Introduction to geomorphology. Orient Longman. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2020.102009.
[40] Nag, S.K. and Chakraborty, S., 2003. Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 31, p.25. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03030749.
[41] Thronbury. 1966. Principles of geomorphology. 10th print, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, p. 618. https://www.scribd.com/document/519492443/Thornbury-William-D-Principles-of-Geomorphology-John-Wiley-Sons-1954.
[42] Sharma, S.A., 2014. Morphometrical analysis of Imphal River basin using GIS. International Journal of Geology, Earth & Environmental Sciences2014, 4(2), p.138. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/MORPHOMETRICAL-ANALYSIS-OF-IMPHAL-RIVER-BASIN-USING-Sharma/e69e558b792d0606a3fd08701250bf59faf6e73c.
[43] Nagal, S., Tignath, S. and Pandey, A., 2014. Morphometric analysis of the adwa river basin, tributary of belan river, India. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Research, 4(2), p.39. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/MORPHOMETRIC-ANALYSIS-OF-THE-ADWA-RIVER-BASIN%2C-OF-Nagal-Tignath/aa0451f7c0eb7775e91578c22cfb4f219b61aecb.
[44] Suresh, R., 2012. Soil and water conservation engineering. Standard Publishers Distributors.
[45] Smith, K.G., 1950. Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. American journal of Science, 248(9), p.655. http://dx.doi.org/10.2475/ajs.248.9.655.
[46] Mohammed, K.M. and Karim, T.H., 2020a. Watershed prioritization across Erbil province for soil erosion management via morphometric analysis. The Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Science, 51(5), p.1262. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v51i5.1134.
[47] Schmid, B.H., 1997. Critical rainfall duration for overland flow from an infiltrating plane surface. Journal of hydrology, 193(1-4), p.45. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/1997JHyd..193...45S/doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03152-6.
[48] Das, A.N.U.P. and Mukherjee, S., 2005. Drainage morphometry using satellite data and GIS in Raigad district, Maharashtra. J Geol Soc India, 65, p.577. https://www.geosocindia.org/index.php/jgsi/article/view/82326.
[49] Joji, V.S., Nair, A.S.K. and Baiju, K.V., 2013. Drainage basin delineation and quantitative analysis of Panamaram Watershed of Kabani River Basin, Kerala using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 82(4), p.368. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12594-013-0164-x.
[50] Gravelius H., 1914. Grundrifi der gesamten Gewcisserkunde. Band I: Flufikunde (Compendium of Hydrology, vol. I. Rivers, in German). Goschen, Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2021.71013.
[51] Zăvoianu I. 1985. Morphometry of drainage basins, Edit. Elsevier, Amsterdam – Oxford - New York – Tokyo. https://shop.elsevier.com/books/morphometry-of-drainage-basins/zavoianu/978-0-444-99587-2.
[52] Savita, R.S., Satishkumar, U., Mittal, H.K., Singh, P.K. and Yadav, K.K., 2017. Analysis of hydrological inferences through morphometric analysis a remote sensing-GIS based study of Kanakanala Reservoir Subwatershed. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research (IJASR), 7(6), p.378-388.
[53] Altaf, F., Meraj, G. and Romshoo, S.A., 2013. Morphometric Analysis to infer hydrological behaviour of Lidder watershed, Western Himalaya, India. Geography Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/178021.
[54] Suresh, R. (2012). Soil and water conservation engineering. Standard Publishers Distributors. Delhi. p.793. https://www.amazon.in/Soil-Water-Conservation-Engineering-PB/dp/8180141861.
[55] Palaka, R. and Sankar, G.J., 2016. Study of watershed characteristics using Google Elevation Service. Geospatial world. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.5103.0080.
[56] Asfaw, D. and Workineh, G., 2019. Quantitative analysis of morphometry on Ribb and Gumara watersheds: Implications for soil and water conservation. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 7(2), p.150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.02.003.
[57] Han, Y., Feng, G. and Ouyang, Y., 2018. Effects of soil and water conservation practices on runoff, sediment and nutrient losses. Water, 10(10), p.1333. https://doi:10.3390/w10101333.
[58] Sarma, P.K., Sarmah, K., Chetri, P.K. and Sarkar, A., 2013. Geospatial study on morphometric characterization of Umtrew River basin of Meghalaya, India. International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, 5(8), p.489. doi 10.5897/IJWREE2012.0367.
[59] Pareta, K. and Pareta, U., 2011. Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(1), p.248. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijggs&volume=2&issue=1&article=022.
[60] Bhunia, G.S., Samanta, S. and Pal, B., 2012. Quantitative analysis of relief characteristics using space technology. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 2(8), p.350. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=19805fd7b8f93ad9713cff549bb9792afc5376d9.
[61] Nir, D., 1957. The ratio of relative and absolute altitudes of Mt. Carmel: a contribution to the problem of relief analysis and relief classification. Geographical Review, 47(4), p.564. https://doi.org/10.2307/211866.
[62] Farhan, Y., Anbar, A., Enaba, O. and Al-Shaikh, N., 2015. Quantitative analysis of geomorphometric parameters of Wadi Kerak, Jordan, using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 7(06), p.456. http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=55519.
[63] Ibrahim, S.A., 2019. Morphometric analysis of the Al-Teeb River basin, SE Iraq, using digital elevation model and GIS. Iraqi Bulletin of Geology and Mining, 15(1), p.59. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/515bcfedef6fec3d.
[64] Shekar, P.R. and Mathew, A., 2022. Morphometric analysis for prioritizing sub-watersheds of Murredu River basin, Telangana State, India, using a geographical information system. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 69(1), p.1. https://jeas.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s44147-022-00094-4.
[65] Mani, A., Kumari, M. and Badola, R., 2022. Morphometric analysis of Suswa River Basin using geospatial techniques. Engineering Proceedings, 27(1), p.65. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsa-9-13225.
[66] Kang, D.H., 2005. Distributed snowmelt modeling with GIS and Casc2d at California Gulch, Colorado (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University). https://www.engr.colostate.edu/~pierre/ce_old/resume/Theses%20and%20Dissertations/Kang%20Thesis.pdf.
[67] Joy, M.A.R., Upaul, S., Fatema, K. and Amin, F.M., 2023. Application of GIS and remote sensing in morphometric analysis of river basin at the south-western part of great Ganges delta, Bangladesh. Hydrology Research. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2023.087.
[68] Yadav, S.K., Singh, S.K., Gupta, M. and Srivastava, P.K., 2014. Morphometric analysis of Upper Tons basin from Northern Foreland of Peninsular India using CARTOSAT satellite and GIS. Geocarto International, 29(8), p.895-914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2013.868043.
[69] Pike, R.J. and Wilson, S.E., 1971. Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral, and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 82(4), p.1079. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1971)82[1079:ERHIAG]2.0.CO;2. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 247 PDF Download: 163 |
||