Mizal Rashida, M. (2023). Anatomical personalized plate implants(APPIs) are the best choice for the treatment of distal femur fracture. Alustath, 16(1), 30-36. doi: 10.30772/qjes.v16i1.833
Mohammed Mizal Rashida. "Anatomical personalized plate implants(APPIs) are the best choice for the treatment of distal femur fracture". Alustath, 16, 1, 2023, 30-36. doi: 10.30772/qjes.v16i1.833
Mizal Rashida, M. (2023). 'Anatomical personalized plate implants(APPIs) are the best choice for the treatment of distal femur fracture', Alustath, 16(1), pp. 30-36. doi: 10.30772/qjes.v16i1.833
Mizal Rashida, M. Anatomical personalized plate implants(APPIs) are the best choice for the treatment of distal femur fracture. Alustath, 2023; 16(1): 30-36. doi: 10.30772/qjes.v16i1.833

Anatomical personalized plate implants(APPIs) are the best choice for the treatment of distal femur fracture

Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences
Volume 16, Issue 1, March 2023, Pages 30-36    PDF (351.14 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30772/qjes.v16i1.833
Author
Mohammed Mizal Rashida*
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Collage of Engineering, University of Muthana,, Iraq.
Abstract
For the purpose of fixing the fractured distal femur, usually resorts to the use of metal internal fixation plates with all the accompanying (supportive) fixing devices such as screws, pins, and wires. These plates are manufactured according to standard dimensions and this means that they may not completely match the surface of the fractured distal femur for all patients, especially if the outer surface of the distal femur is complex and own more complex geometry., such as the distal femur. The complete mismatch, if it occurs, may lead to the emergence of immediate and future problems for the purpose of avoiding the occurrence of this problem and its accompanying complications and for the purpose of developing and accelerating the process of gaining complete recovery for the patient and saving time, effort, and money, in this paper, a new method is present to achieve the above goals through the design and manufacture of a three-dimensional plate for a specific patient that perfectly matches the external surface of the broken distal femur. Modern technologies are employed in the manufacturing process (additive manufacturing methods) to obtain an accurate plate dedicated to the fracture distal femur of a specific patient.
Keywords
Plate; Distal Femur; Specific Patient; Anatomical; Fixation
References
  • I D. Anitha, S. D. De, K. K. Sun, H. K. Doshi, and T. Lee, Improving stability of locking compression plates through a design modification: A computational investigation, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 153–161, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/10255842.2013.785536.
  • V. Thakkar and M. S. Dwivedi, Open distal femur fractures: Treatment principles, Int. J. Orthopaedics Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 732–736, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i4i.89.
  • C. Link and R. H. Babst, Current concepts in fractures of the distal femur, Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 11–20, Feb. 2012.
  • Heiney, M. D. Barnett, G. Vrabec, A. J. Schoenfild, A. Baji, and G. O. Njus, ‘‘Distal femoral fixation: A biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (I.M.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate,’’ J. Trauma Acute Care Surg., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 443–449, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815edeb8.
  • Garg, R. Malhotra, V. Kunma, and P. P. Kotwal, Less invasive stabilizing system plate versus retrograde intramedullary nail for osteoporotic distal femoral fracture, Eur. J. Orthopaedic Surg. Traumatol., vol. 21,no. 5, pp. 381–386, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s00590-010-0713-6.
  • A. Jang, Y. S. Byun, I. H. Han, and D. Shin, Medial plating ofdistal femoral fracture with locking compression plate-proximal lateral tibia: Cases’ report, J. Korean Fract. Soc., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 206–212,Jan. 2016, doi: 10.12671/jkfs.2016.29.3.206.
  • R. Yarboro, Lateral distal femur plate for periprosthetic fracture,J. Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 32, no. S1, pp. S30–S31, Aug. 2018,doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001199.
  • C. Arnone, C. V. Ward, G. J. D. Rocca, B. D. Crist, and A. S. El-Gizawy, Simulation-based design of orthopedic trauma implants, in Proc. Int.Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo., 2010, pp. 465–474, doi: 10.1115/imece2010-40936.
  • Harith, J. Malekani, B. Schmutz, M. Schuetz, and P. K. Yarlagadda, A method for optimal fit of patient-specific fracture fixation plates, Proc.Inst. Mech. Eng. L, J. Mater., Des. Appl., vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 282–290,Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1464420715569586.
  • Okazaki, Development trends of custom-made orthopedic implants, J. Artif. Organs, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2012, doi: 1007/s10047-011- 0584-6.
  • Chen, Z. Zhao, J. Liu, X. Cui, D. Zhang, X. Su, J. Zhang,P. Tang, and H. Liao, Automatic estimation of morphological characteristics of the proximal tibia for precise plate treatment using model matching, Comput. Med. Imag. Grap., vol. 81, Feb. 2020, Art. no. 101714,doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101714.
  • Ren, Y. Zhang, Z. Guo, X. Bu, and S. Lin, Symbol computer-aided a personalized anatomic plate of the distal femur, J. Clin. RehabilitativeTissue Eng. Res., vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 2309–2312, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.13.008.
  • Memon, D. Patel, and N. Patel, Functional outcomes of retrograde femoral nailing in extra-articular distal third femoral fractures,International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2020; 6(1): 143-146
  • Henderson et al. Locking Plates for Distal Femur Fractures: Is There a Problem With Fracture Healing, J Orthop Trauma Volume 25, Number 2 Supplement, February 2011
  • DEMİRTAŞ, et al, Comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and bridge plating in the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal femur, Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014;48(5):521-526.
  • Shen, J. Zhang, and P. Du, Personalized design for dissection steel plate based on CT picture and reverse engineering, Machinery Des. Manuf., vol. 7, pp. 161–162, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.19356/j.cnki.1001- 3997.2011.07.064
  • Cronskär, L. E. Rännar, and M. Bäckström, Implementation of digital design and solid free-form fabrication for customization of implants in trauma orthopaedics, J. Med. Biol. Eng., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 399–401, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.5405/jmbe.883.
  • Zhang, D. Malcolm, J. Hislop-Jambrich, C. David, L. Thomas, and P. Michael, An anatomical region-based statistical shape model of the human femur, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., Imag. Vis., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 176–185, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1080/21681163. 2013.878668.
  • Manić, Z. Stamenkovic, M. Mitkovic, M. Stojkovic, and D. E. Shephard, Design of 3D model of customized anatomically adjusted implants, Facta Universitatis, Ser., Mech. Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 269–282, Dec. 2015
  • [20] Ahmad, et al., Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability, Injury. 2007 Mar;38(3):358-64.
  • Samiezadeh, P. T. Avval, Z. Fawaz, and H. Bougherara, On the optimization of a composite bone plate using the selective stress shielding approach, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 42, pp. 138–153,Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.015.
  • Snow et al ., A Mechanical Comparison of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP) and the Low Contact-Dynamic Compression Plate (DCP) in an Osteoporotic Bone Model, J Orthop Trauma, Volume 22, Number 2, February 2008
  • Snow, G. Thompson, P. G. Turner, A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model, J Orthop Trauma,2008 Feb;22(2):121-5.
  • Vijayavenkataraman, A. Gopinath, and W. F. Lu, A new design of 3D printed orthopedic bone plates with auxetic structures to mitigate stress shielding and improve intra-operative bending, Bio-Des. Manuf., vol. 3,no. 2, pp. 98–108, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42242-020-00066-8.
  • Trajanovic,et al.,the morphological approach to geometrical modelling of the distal femur,2nd South-East European Conference on Computational Mechanics,hodes, Greece, 22–24 June 2009.
  • Stojkovic et al, Analysis of femoral trochanters morphology based on geometrical model, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research,Vol. 71, March 2012, pp. 210-216
  • Xu, et al, Thermal Deformation Defect Prediction for Layered Printing Using Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network, Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(19), 6860; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196860
  • CHEN , Z. MAO, X. JIANG, Feature-Based Design of Personalized Anatomical Plates for the Treatment of Femoral Fractures, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ VOLUME 9, 2021
  • C. Wong, 3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics, Orthop. Res. Rev. 2016, 8, 57–66.
  • Wu, et al, Biomechanical Analysis and Design Method for patient-Specific Reconstructive Implants for Large Bone Defects of the Distal Lateral FemurBiosensors 2022, 12, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12010004.
  • Chen, et al, A parametric approach to construct femur models and their fixation plates, Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment Volume 30, 2016 - Issue 3,Pages 529-537
Statistics
Article View: 318
PDF Download: 44


Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus.com