Study of positive parity states form factors for 17O nucleus with Skyrme-Hartree-Fock method | ||
| Kirkuk Journal of Science | ||
| Article 2, Volume 18, Issue 2, June 2023, Pages 15-23 PDF (1.05 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.32894/kujss.2023.138864.1096 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Aziz H. Fatah* 1; Awara Rasul Mohammed2 | ||
| 1Department of Physics, College of Science, Sulaimanya University, Sulaimanya | ||
| 2Department of Physics, College of Science, Sulaimanya University, Sulaimanya , Iraq | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Elastic and inelastic electron scattering form factors for the 17O nucleus are calculated for the positive parity low-lying states in the momentum transfer interval 0.05-3 fm in the framework of shell model and Skyrme-Hartree-Fock calculations. Also, protons, neutrons, mass and charges root mean square, r.m.s., radii and the charge spatial density distribution are calculated. The ZBME model space out of 12C nuclei core with rewile interaction have been used. For all selected ground and excited states, Skyrme interactions with SkXcsb and SLy4 parameter, harmonic and Wood-Saxon potentials are adopted in Hartree-Fock theory to generate the mean potential and hence calculate the elements of single-particle matrix and form factors. Also, we have used Tassie model to account for core-polarization effect. Finally, to check the reality of the calculated values, the charges r.m.s. and form factors are discussed and compared to the measured values. A good agreement can be shown by the theoretical results to the measured ones. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Electron scattering; Shell model; Skyrme interaction; Hartree-Fock method; Tassie model; Form factor | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] Amritansshu Shukla and Suresh Kumar Patra. Nuclear Structure Physics. Tylor and Francis Group, 1st edition, 2021.
[2] W. A. Richter and B. A. Brown. Nuclear charge densities with the skyrme hartree-fock method. Pysical Review C, 67: 034317, 2003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.67.034317.
[3] R. A. Radhi, Ali A. Alzubadi, and Noori S. Manie. Electromagnetic multipoles of positive parity states in 27Al by elastic and inelastic electron scattering. Nuclear Physics A, 1015: 122302, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122302.
[4] A. K. Hamoudi, M. A. Hasan, and A. R. Ridha. Nucleon momentum distributions and elastic electron scattering form factors for some 1p-shell nuclei. Pramana, 78(5): 737–748, 2021, doi:10.1007/s12043-012-0269-6.
[5] S. J. Ahmad, K. S. Jassim, and F. A. Majeed. The effect of core polarization by means of tassie and bohr-mottelson models for some FP-shell nuclei. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(5): 200, 2021, doi:10.5373/JARDCS/V12I5/20201705.
[6] B. Waldman and G. B. Collins. Nuclear excitation of lead by X-rays. Physical Review Journals Archive, 57: 338–339, 1940, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.57.338.2.
[7] A. A. Alzubadi, R. A. Radhim, and N. S. Manie. Shell model and hartree-fock calculations of longitudinal and transverse electroexcitation of positive and negative parity states in 17O. Physical Review C, 97: 024316, 2018, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024316.
[8] D. M. Manley, B. L. Berman, W. Bertozzi, T. N. Buti, J. M. Finn, F. W. Hersman, C. E. Hyde-Wright, M. V. Hynes, J. J. Kelly, M. A. Kovash, S. Kowalski, R. W. Lourie, B. Murdock, B. E. Norum, B. Pugh, and C. P. Sargent. High-resolution inelastic electron scattering from 17O. Physical Review C, 36: 1700–1726, 1987, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.36.1700.
[9] J. C. Kim, R. Yen, I. P. Auer, and H. S. Caplan. Low-lying octupole excitations in 17O. Physics Letters B, 57(4): 341–344, 1975, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90466-9.
[10] M. V. Hynes, H. Miska, B. Norum, W. Bertozzi, S. Kowalski, F. N. Rad, C. P. Sargent, T. Sasanuma, W. Turchinetz, and B. L. Berman. Electron scattering from the ground-state magnetization distribution of 17O. Physical Review Letters, 42(22): 1444, 1979, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.42.1444.
[11] G. Bohannon, L. Zamick, and E. M. de Guerra. Structural considerations for elastic magnetic electron-nucleus scattering. Nuclear Physics A, 334(2): 278–296, 1980, doi:10.1016/0375-9474(80)90069-X. [12] S. A. Coon and L. Jaqua. Wave function effects and the elastic magnetic form factor of 17O. Physical Review C, 44(1): 203, 2022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.44.203.
[13] R.A. Radhi, N.T. Khalaf, and A.A. Najim. Elastic magnetic electron scattering from 17O, 25Mg and 27Al. Nuclear Physics A, 75(11): e14675, 2021, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01009-1.
[14] J. L. Han, Q. Wang, Z. G. Xiao, H. S. Xu, Z. Y. Sun, Z. G. Hu, X. Y. Zhang, H. W. Wang, R. S. Mao, X. H. Yuan, and Z. G. Xu. Exotic behavior of elastic scattering
differential cross-sections of weakly bound nucleus f-17 at small angles. High energy physics and nuclear physics, 30(11): 1058–1061, 2006. [15] E. Strano, D. Torresi, M. Mazzocco, N. Keeley, A. Boiano, C. Boiano, P. Di Meo, A. Guglielmetti, M. La Commara, P. Molini, and C. Manea. 17O+58Ni scattering and reaction dynamics around the coulomb barrier. Physical Review C, 94(2): 024622, 2016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024622. [16] S. A. Abbas and K. H. Mahdi. The effects of corepolarization on the form factors of 17O, 19F and 48Ca. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engi- neering, 871(1): 012092. [17] MN. El-Hammamy, NA. El-Nohy, M. El-Azab Farid, S Diab, and Moamen M. El-Sayed. Systematic analysis of 17,19F and 16,17O elastic scattering on 208Pb just below the coulomb barrier. Chinese Journal of Physics, 73:136–146, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.cjph.2021.03.027. [18] Shayma’a H. A., Ahmed A. A., and Ali H. Taqi. Effect of incompressibility and symmetry energy density on charge distribution and radii of closed-shell nuclei. Kirkuk University Journal-Scientific Studies, 17(3): 17–28, 2022, doi: 10.32894/KUJSS.2022.135889.1073. [19] X. Pan, Y. T. Zou, H. M. Liu, B. He, X. H. Li, X. J. Wu, and Z. Zhang. Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity half-lives using the two-potential and skyrme hartree-fock approaches. Chinese Physics C, 45(12): 124104,2021, doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000330. [20] Ali H. T. and Abdullah H. I. Collective excitations of 14n and 10b nuclei. Kirkuk University Journal-Scientific Studies, 11(1): 202–212, 2016, doi: 10.32894/KU- JSS.2016.124396. [21] E. B. Suckling. Nuclear structure and dynamics from the fully unrestricted Skyrme-Hartree-Fock model. University of Surrey, United Kingdom, 2011.
[22] M. Valli `eres, H. Wu, (auth.), Prof. H. Langanke, Prof. A. Joachim Maruhn, and (eds.) Prof. S. E. Koonin. Computational Nuclear Physics 1: Nuclear Structure. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1991. [23] H. Aytekin, E. Tel, R. Baldik, and A. Aydin. An investigation for ground state features of some structural fusion materials. Journal of Fusion Energy, 30(1): 21–25, 2011, doi:10.1007/s10894-010-9326-7. [24] BA Brown and WDM Rae. The shell-model code nushellx@ msu. Nuclear Data Sheets, 120: 115–118, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.022. [25] Krassimira Marinova and Istvan Angeli. Nuclear charge radii. International Atomic Energy Agency, 99: 69–95, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.adt.2011.12.006. Kirkuk U. J. Sci. Stud. Vol. 18, Iss. 2, p 00-00, 2023 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 191 PDF Download: 188 |
||