Appropriate and inappropriate research tools for descriptive master's researches In the College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Mosul
|Al-Rafidain Journal For Sport Sciences|
|Volume 26, Issue 80, April 2023, Pages 98-113 PDF (1.96 M)|
|Document Type: Research Paper|
|Raneen Abd alkahar Khalid; Thilam Younis Allawy|
|College of Physical Education & Sports Sciences / University of Mosul|
| The aim of the search is to:|
Identify the distribution of research tools used by master's students in the College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences at the University of Mosul, according to their scientific orientations.
Identify the suitability of the research tools used with the standards that must be available in the researches of master's students in the College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences at the University of Mosul.
The researchers used the descriptive analytical and documentary method, and the sample consisted of master’s theses in the College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences at the University of Mosul, which numbered (167), And the percentage, As for, uh, the results were represented by:
A number of research tools and established criteria (technical observation, physical tests, skill tests, practical achievement test, digital achievement test, functional tests and measurements, performance paper and pencil test, physical construction measurements, physical and biomechanical measurements), which means the accuracy of their use.
The (questionnaire, interview, scale, objective observation, and self-observation) are research tools that showed their inadequacy for some of the criteria set for use.
Like the questionnaire, the most research tool is inappropriate for some criteria in physical education and sports science messages.
|Appropriate; inappropriate; research tools|
Article View: 67
PDF Download: 99