Iraqi EFL Learners' Comprehension of Indirect Speech Acts in Literary Texts | ||
Anbar University Journal of Languages & Literature | ||
Article 30, Volume 14, Issue 2, June 2022, Pages 751-779 PDF (514.85 K) | ||
Document Type: Research Paper | ||
DOI: 10.37654/aujll.2022.176403 | ||
Authors | ||
Mariam Asaad Dakheel* 1; Ammar Al Abdely* 2 | ||
1College of Education for Women/ University Of Anbar | ||
2College of Education for Women-University Of Anbar | ||
Abstract | ||
EFL learners exhibit differences in their ability to communicate successfully in English language. More specifically, they may respond differently in their quest to determine the intended meaning of indirect speech acts in literary texts. Even though, EFL learners have knowledge in the grammar and word meaning of the L2 or the FL, they are assumed to suffer in identifying the intended meaning due to their lack of the necessary functional information. Accordingly, the current study is an endeavor to examine the pragmatic competence of Iraqi EFL learners at the university level, more specifically, their ability to identify intended meanings behind indirect speech acts in the novel ''Jane Eyre'' by Charlotte Bronte (1847). Based on its objectives, the type of research methodology used is qualitative and quantative one as it analyzed the data numerically and the utterances qualitatively. The research design includes five parts: the introductory part, the previous studies part the literature review part, the methodology part, and the analysis part. The study utilized a recognition test to be the study instrument applied to a sample of participants who were selected randomly including (20) EFL learners at fourth stage. The Relevance Based Approach to Speech Acts was followed with some modifications made to suit the study objectives. The study findings revealed that Iraqi EFL learners encountered difficulties when identifying the intended meaning of indirect acts. In addition, they tend to choose the direct and relevant information to represent the intended meaning. The unsatisfactory comprehending ability of indirect utterances can be ascribed to the learners' lack of pragmatic competence. | ||
Keywords | ||
Speech Act Theory; Relevance Theory; Direct and Indirect Speech Acts; Pragmatic Competence | ||
References | ||
References Alberts, A. R. (2011). The Marriage Proposal in Selected Nineteenth-Century English Novels. Retrieved from: https://shorturl.at/fmJKR
Austin, J.L. (1968). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. New York. 115-116.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(1).677-713.
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics. John Benjamin's Publishing Company. Amsterdam.
Bronte, Charlotte. (1847). Jane Eyre. Smith, Elder & Co. London.
Carston, R., & George, P. (2006). Relevance theory: New directions and developments. In The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of language. Edited by E. LePore and B. C. Smith,: Oxford University Press. Oxford. Chokwiwatkul, R., & Tawilapakul, U. (2017). Indirect speech act comprehension of Thai undergraduate students in ESP context (Doctoral dissertation, Master’s Thesis, Thammasat University). Couteur, A. L. (1996). Indirectness and Politeness in Requesting: An Analysis of Sociolinguistic and Pragmatic Aspects in an Australian Context. University of Adelaide Library. Australia.
Fatah, Y., S., and Ibrahim, Noor; Abdullah, Tina. (2020). An Overview of Using Pragmatic Study Among EFL/ESL University Learners. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 11427-11442. Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English language education. Routledge. Pp.202
Holtgraves, Thomas. (2007). Second Language Learners and Speech Act. Comprehension. Language Learning, 57(4), pp.595 - 610.
Huang, Y. (2014). Pragmatics. Second Edition. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
Kaburise, Phyllis. (2012). Recognizing speech acts. Per Linguam, 28 (1), 36-48.
Levinson, S. C. (1980). Speech Act Theory: The state of the Art. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 13(1), 5- 24.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication: The process, barriers, and improving effectiveness. Schooling, 1(1), 1-10. Ma, Maoxiang, and Li, Yingxia. (2016). Multidimensional Interpretation of Speech Indirectness. English Language and Literature Studies. 6(1). 133-138. Mao, T., & He, S. (2021). An integrated approach to pragmatic competence: Its framework and properties. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211011472. Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury. London.
Rafieyan, Vahid, & Rozycki, William. (2019). Development of Language Proficiency and Pragmatic Competence in an Immersive Language Program. World Journal of English Language, 9(1), 10-21.
Saeed, J. (2003). Semantics (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publushing Ltd.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Basil Blackwell. Oxford.
Taguchi, N. (2013). Production of Routines in L2 English: Effect of Proficiency and Study-Abroad Experience. System, 41(1), 109-121.
Takimoto, M. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the development of learners’ pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (3). 369-386.
Takkaç Tulgar, A. (2016). The role of pragmatic competence in foreign language education. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1). 10–19.
Wardhaugh, R. (1986). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5thed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Wu, L. (2015). A Contrastive Study of Interpretations of Metaphor from Pragmatic Perspective. English Literature and Language Review, 1(1). 1-4.
Wyner, L., & Cohen, A. D. (2015). Second language pragmatic ability: Individual differences according to environment. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teacbing, 5 (4), 519-556.
Xiao, Feng. (2015). Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5 (4), p. 557-581. | ||
Statistics Article View: 88 PDF Download: 92 |