Study the Effect of Cutting Parameters of Abrasive Water Jet Process on Aluminum Alloy 5083 | ||
| Anbar Journal of Engineering Sciences | ||
| Article 12, Volume 13, Issue 2, November 2022, Pages 99-105 PDF (771.24 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37649/aengs.2022.176363 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Safaa Kadhim Ghazi; mostafa adel* ; Alaa Hassan Shabeeb | ||
| Department of Production Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Technology, Baghdad-Iraq | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The most common type of abrasive water jet is known as a valuable and advanced non-traditional machining operation due to its no heat-affected zone, best in removing material, very environmentally friendly, and no mechanical stresses. This paper gives an idea about Abrasive water jets in terms of applications, advantages, and limitations. Also illustrates the influence of the parameters on the material removal rate. The effect of feed rate, pressure, and stand-off distance were worked, at three levels for material removal rate (MRR) to machining Aluminium alloy type-5083 by using a tool consisting of a mixture of 70% water and 30% abrasives of red garnet. The distance of the standoff has the most significant impact on the rate of material removal, which is subsequently followed by the feed rate and finally the pressure. The findings demonstrated that the Taguchi model is capable of making accurate predictions regarding the machining reactions, with a rate of material removal of 93.3%. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| water jet; MRR; Taguchi method | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] A. Shastri, A. Nargundkar and A. J. Kulkarni, Socio-Inspired (2021).Optimization Methods for Advanced Manufacturing Processes, Birmingham, UK: Springer,
[2] F. Kartal and H. Gökkaya(2015).Effect of abrasive water jet turning process parameters on surface roughness and material removal rate of AISI 1050 steel, Materials Testing, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 773-782,
[3] S. Arun, N. Balaji, and S. Kannan(2016).investigation of material removal rate and surface finish on Inconel 718 by abrasive water jet machining," International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 43-47.
[4] M. A. khan and K. Gupta(2019).Machining Ni-Cr-Fe based superalloy using abrasive water jet cutting process and its surface studies. Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 19, pp. 2139-2143.
[5] D. Maneiah, M. Shunmugasundaram, A. Raji Reddy andZ. Begum(2020).Optimization of machining parameters for surface roughness during abrasive water jet machining of aluminum/magnesium hybrid metal matrix composites," Materials Today: Proceedings.
[6] C. Joel and T. Jeyapoovan(2021).Optimization of machinability parameters in abrasive water jet machining of AA7075 using Grey-Taguchi method," Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 37, pp. 37-741.
[7] L.Cano-SalinasaX.SourdaK.MoussaouiaS.Le RouxbM.SalembA.HoraR.Zitoune(2023).Effect of process parameters of Plain Water Jet on the cleaning quality, surface and material integrity of Inconel 718 milled by Abrasive Water Jet'', Tribology International Volume 178, Part B,108094.
[8] Monika Kulisz , Ireneusz Zagórski and Jarosław Korpysa(2020).The Effect of Abrasive Waterjet Machining Parameters on the Condition of Al-Si Alloy .Materials 13, 3122
[9] K. Verma, V. Anandakrishnan and S. Sathish, (2020).Modelling and analysis of abrasive water jet machining of AA2014 alloy with Al2O3 abrasive using fuzzy logic," Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 21, pp. 652-657.
[10] H. A. El-Hofy(2005).Advanced Machining Processes, United States of America: McGraw-Hill.
[11] G. Ramu, B. Bapiraju and M. L. Kumari, (2013).Theoretical and graphical analysis of abrasive water jet turning," International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), vol. 3, no. 5, pp-3207-3215.
[12] Y. W. Seo, M. Ramulu and D. Kim,(2013).Machinability of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) by abrasive waterjets," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 217, no. 12, pp. 1709-1721. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 133 PDF Download: 106 |
||