The Reality of Women Soldiers' Violence in Peter Morris's Guardians | ||
Anbar University Journal of Languages & Literature | ||
Article 13, Volume 13, Issue 4, December 2021, Pages 368-392 PDF (1.02 M) | ||
Document Type: Research Paper | ||
DOI: 10.37654/aujll.2021.176147 | ||
Authors | ||
Thamir Saad Barrak* 1; Dr. Elaff Ghanim Salih* 2 | ||
1General Directory of Anbar Education-Iraq | ||
2University Of Anbar | ||
Abstract | ||
This paper examines the reality of women soldiers' violence in Peter Morris's play, Guardians, because the societies look at woman as vulnerable to many kinds of violence including sexual harassment, abuse and assault. Brutality is solely ascribed to men due to the binary narrative of gender which renders woman as the weaker whereas man as the powerful. Thus, the possibility of woman’s acting violence is excluded from any consideration in most of the past written literature. Therefore the current paper aims to examine the reality of women soldiers’ violence to demystify the binary narrative of gender in light of Judith Butler's theory Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity and its concept of Performativity (1999). Accordingly, the present study argues that women soldiers can be perpetrators as men can be according to their repeated actions and performance. The behaviors of the female soldier in the play are out of the binary narrative of gender then out of the social construction of violence. This paper approves the de-gendered nature of violence, in other words, a de-construction of the binary system of gender and in turn violence in the military. It concludes that gender is a matter of acting, and performance decides the individual’s identity not his/her sex. Moreover, the present paper finds that women soldiers' behaviors are affected by their cultural and social environment. The righteousness of Butler’s statement that gender is socially and culturally constructed is proved throughout the present study. Accordingly, the binary system of understanding violence fuels the inequalities between male and female. | ||
Keywords | ||
Soldier women; Violence; Peter Morris's Guardians; Judith Butler's Gender Trouble; Performativity | ||
References | ||
Works Cited -Ables, M. (2019). Women aren’t the Problem. Standards are. Modern War Institute at West Point, 5 February. -Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity GT. Political Theory, 4(4). -Cawkill, P., Rogers, A., Knight, S., & Spear, L. (2009). Women in Ground Close Combat Roles: The Experiences of Other Nations and a Review of the Academic Literature. Laboratory DSaT, editor. Fareham: UK Ministry of Defence. -Davis, L., Tercha, J., Hill, A., Klauberg, W. X., White, A., Owen, B., ... & Klahr, A. (2020). 2019 Military Services Gender Relations Focus Groups: Active Duty. Office of People Analytics. -Fallwell, L., & Williams, K. V. (Eds.). (2016). Gender and the Representation of Evil. Routledge. -Kaufman-Osborn, T. (2005). Gender Trouble at Abu Ghraib?. Politics & Gender, 1(4), 597-619. -Morgenroth, T., & Ryan, M. K. (2018). Gender Trouble in Social Psychology: How can Butler’s Work Inform Experimental Social Psychologists’ Conceptualization of Gender? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1320. -Morris, P. (2007). Guardians. Dramatists Play Service. Inc., December, 31. -Patten, E., & Parker, K. (2011). Women in the US Military: Growing share, Distinctive Profile. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. -Ton, J. T. (2018). Judith Butler’s Notion of Gender Performativity: To What Extent does Gender Performativity Exclude a Stable Gender Identity? Master dissertation. -Wolf, B. (2014). Shaping the Visual of Gender Based Violence: How Visual Discourse on Intimate Partner Violence and European Anti-Violence Initiatives Construct Accounts of the Social World. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. -Yeung, D., Steiner, C. E., Hardison, C. M., Hanser, L. M., & Kamarck, K. N. (2017). Recruiting Policies and Practices for Women in the Military: Views from the Field. RAND Corporation Santa Monica United States. | ||
Statistics Article View: 41 PDF Download: 42 |