Assessment of Bone Density around Dental Implants Using Two Platelet-Rich Fibrin Protocols (A Comparative Clinical Study) | ||
| Al-Rafidain Dental Journal | ||
| Article 7, Volume 22, Issue 2, September 2022, Pages 280-291 PDF (776.05 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.33899/rden.2021.128683.1058 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Rahma Atheed Kamal1; Rayan Salim* 2 | ||
| 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul | ||
| 2Dean of College of Dentistry, University of Mosul | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Aims: The current study aimed to compare bone density means around dental implants covered with one of two platelet rich fibrin preparation protocols (Standard-Platelet Rich Fibrin and Advanced-Platelet Rich Fibrin) using standard intraoral digital periapical radiographs. Materials and methods: A total of ten male patients with an age range of 28-51 years participated in this split-mouth clinical study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the platelet rich fibrin (PRF) protocol to be used with dental implant insertion into positive control (S-PRF) and study group (A-PRF). Each patient represented the two groups in which he received 2 dental implants; ten implants for each group (a total of 20 dental implants) of standard length and diameter in the posterior mandibular extraction sites of ipsilateral or contralateral side. In the positive control group, the standard PRF protocol was to be used to prepare the PRF clot. In the study group, the advanced PRF protocol was to be used to prepare the PRF clot. Both PRF membranes were to be instilled inside the osteotomy bed during dental fixture installation. Following the installation of dental implants and as a basis for comparison between both groups, densitometric analysis of bone around dental implants at immediate, four, eight and twelve weeks scheduled visits were made. Results: Total densitometric analysis results showed no significant difference within S-PRF group, within A-PRF group and between both groups, with the highest mean (167.07) being at twelve weeks after surgery in the A-PRF group. Conclusions: Both S-PRF and A-PRF, similarly enhanced and maintained bone density (synergistic effect) throughout the of study and as disclosed by densitometric values. The use of PRF in its current forms seems to be an accepted minimally invasive approach with good clinical results. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Platelet- Rich Fibrin; PRF; Platelet concentrates | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 252 PDF Download: 209 |
||