Droplets Generation using Soluble Polymeric and Surfactant Additives in a Micro-Flow System: An Experimental Approach | ||
| Engineering and Technology Journal | ||
| Article 8, Volume 40, Issue 10, October 2022, Pages 1342-1351 PDF (1.06 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.30684/etj.2022.134882.1252 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Nur Farra Ilyana Binti Yosman1; Wafaa K. Mahmood2; Hayder A. Abdulbari* 1 | ||
| 1Center of Excellence for Advanced Research in Fluid Flow, University Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, MALAYSIA | ||
| 2Department of Production Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Technology-IRAQ, Baghdad, Iraq. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In the present work, polymer and surfactant solutions (Xanthan Gum- Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) were formulated and tested in a micro-flow system (microchannel) carrying octanoic acid as the hydrocarbon phase to determine the droplets formation capabilities of the two different additives. The purpose is to compare the droplet-generated size, shape, and distance between the droplets forming from the individual additives solutions. The jetting phenomenon that happens during droplet generation was also investigated. The solution of the polymer (XG) and surfactant (CTAB) was prepared in 5 different concentrations (50, 100, 150, 200, and 250) ppm and (500, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500) ppm, respectively. The continuous and dispersed phases' flow was controlled by controlling the inlet pressure of both phases. Direct-writing lithography was used to fabricate the microchannels using polydimethylsiloxane polymer. The microfluidic chip was connected to an open-loop fluid circulation system, and the produced by polymer and surfactant solutions droplets size was recorded using a high-resolution microscope. The droplet generated using the XG solution was larger, and the distance between droplets was shorter as concentration increased. In contrast, the CTAB solutions showed smaller droplets, and the distance between droplets increased as the concentration increased. The possibility of coalescence of the droplet was also higher as the distance between droplets was shorter. In terms of jetting regime, as the pressure ratio increases, the jet breakup length increases before forming the droplet until, at some limit, the dispersed phase was failed to generate droplets. | ||
Highlights | ||
| ||
| Keywords | ||
| Microfluidics,,; ,،,؛Microdroplet generation,,; ,،,؛Polymeric Additives,,; ,،,؛Surfactants,,; ,،,؛Jetting effect | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] H.A. Abdulbari, E. Basheer, Microfluidic Desalination: A New Era Towards Sustainable Water Resources, ChemBioEng Rev. 8 (2021) 121–133. [2] H.A. Abdulbari, E.A. Basheer, Investigating the enhancement of microfluidics-based electrochemical biosensor response with different microchannel dimensions, Current Analytical Chemistry. 13 (2017). [3] L. Capretto, D. Carugo, S. Mazzitelli, C. Nastruzzi, X. Zhang, Microfluidic and lab-on-a-chip preparation routes for organic nanoparticles and vesicular systems for nanomedicine applications, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 65 (2013) 1496–1532. [4] D.T. Chiu, A.J. DeMello, D. di Carlo, P.S. Doyle, C. Hansen, R.M. Maceiczyk, R.C.R. Wootton, Small but perfectly formed? Successes, challenges, and opportunities for microfluidics in the chemical and biological sciences, Chem. 2 (2017) 201–223. [5] F. Fanelli, G. Parisi, L. Degennaro, R. Luisi, Contribution of microreactor technology and flow chemistry to the development of green and sustainable synthesis, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 13 (2017) 520–542. [6] Z.V. Feng, K.R. Edelman, B.P. Swanson, Student-fabricated microfluidic devices as flow reactors for organic and inorganic synthesis, J. Chem. Educ. 92 (2015) 723–727. [7] D.E. Fitzpatrick, C. Battilocchio, S. v Ley, Enabling technologies for the future of chemical synthesis, ACS Cent. Sci. 2 (2016) 131–138. [8] E.D. Lavric, C. Cerato-noyerie, Mass transfer in gas-liquid flow in Corning ® Advanced-Flow TM Reactors, Chemical Engineering Transactions. 29 (2012) 979–984. [9] F.W.M. Ling, W.K. Mahmood, H.A. Abdulbari, Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidics Devices using Xurograhy Method, in: MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017. [10] J. Pelleter, F. Renaud, Facile, fast and safe process development of nitration and bromination reactions using continuous flow reactors, Org. Process Res. Dev. 13 (2009) 698–705. [11] T.W. Phillips, I.G. Lignos, R.M. Maceiczyk, A.J. DeMello, J.C. DeMello, Nanocrystal synthesis in microfluidic reactors: Where next?, Lab on a Chip. 14 (2014) 3172. [12] R. Porta, M. Benaglia, A. Puglisi, Flow chemistry: Recent developments in the synthesis of pharmaceutical products, Organic Process Research & Development. 20 (2016) 2–25. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 228 PDF Download: 224 |
||