THE SPECIFICITY OF THE EVIDENCE IN INVESTIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIARY | ||
| Journal of college of Law for Legal and Political Sciences | ||
| Article 7, Volume 9, issue 35 part 1, December 2020, Pages 227-253 PDF (623.54 K) | ||
| Author | ||
| Wadeea D. Ibrahim | ||
| Abstract | ||
| There is no doubt that in the civil service many things that are considered disciplinary violations require investigation with the guilty employee, and then inflicted the appropriate disciplinary penalty against him, but may not be convinced by the employee imposed on him and believes that he is unfair to him and was not in accordance with the law. The administrative judiciary in order to challenge what was imposed on him to cancel it, so this requires that there be means of proof, whether in the stage of administrative investigation with the employee or when challenged before the administrative judiciary of the employee or by the concerned individuals when affected by a specific administrative decision, and therefore We must know these means that can For use in evidence in the administrative area because they cannot all means are acceptable proof in this area, since he has proof in the administrative area of privacy because the administration relies on documents and records and not on the right of conscience and invocation. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Certificate; evidence proof; administrative stagnation; Writing; general employee; Experience | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 73 PDF Download: 55 |
||