Sabri, N., Abed, M. (2020). EFFECT INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS OF (MAIZE AND MANGBEAN) ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND QUALITY CHARACTERS OF MAIZE CROP. Alustath, 18(2), 274-286. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170536
N. A. Sabri; M. A. Abed. "EFFECT INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS OF (MAIZE AND MANGBEAN) ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND QUALITY CHARACTERS OF MAIZE CROP". Alustath, 18, 2, 2020, 274-286. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170536
Sabri, N., Abed, M. (2020). 'EFFECT INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS OF (MAIZE AND MANGBEAN) ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND QUALITY CHARACTERS OF MAIZE CROP', Alustath, 18(2), pp. 274-286. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170536
Sabri, N., Abed, M. EFFECT INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS OF (MAIZE AND MANGBEAN) ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND QUALITY CHARACTERS OF MAIZE CROP. Alustath, 2020; 18(2): 274-286. doi: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170536

EFFECT INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS OF (MAIZE AND MANGBEAN) ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS AND QUALITY CHARACTERS OF MAIZE CROP

ANBAR JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
Article 10, Volume 18, Issue 2, December 2020, Pages 274-286    PDF (1.39 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.32649/aagrs.2022.170536
Authors
N. A. Sabri; M. A. Abed
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in the (Juwaba) Arund area of Ramadi city in the spring and autumn seasons 2017. To study the effect of intercropping systems and maize varieties on the yield and its components and the quality characters of maize crop, maize varieties (booth 106, 5018, 5012 and French cultivar) were used. The experiment was carried out according to the design of (RCBD) and in the order of the split plot, cultivar wear arranged in Maine poke the main plots and the secondary plots occupies (the intercropping systems). The results showed that the intercropping system 1: 2 was superior in number of ears per plant which gave 1.48 and 1.70 ear in the spring and autumn seasons respectively, also it was superior in the average of 500 grains weight in the spring season by giving 155.4 gm, also the same system in the grain yield in the autumn season by giving 10.96-ton ha-1. While the cultivars, The French cultivar was superior in spring season in seed yield which gave the highest value 7.99 ton ha-1, while the cultivar 5018 was superior in the autumn season by giving the highest grain yield was 11.48 ton ha-1, while the qualitative characters, sole crop for maize was excellence in the percentage of oil on the rest of the farming systems in the autumn season only gave higher mean about 4.74% ,while the intercropping system 1:2 exceeded the in percentage of protein in seeds about 10.32% in spring and autumn seasons.
Keywords
Maize; Mungbean; intercropping; Grain yield; Quality Characters
References
  1. Al-Alousi, A. A., & Elsahookie, M. M. (2006). Hybrid-inbred response of maize under sufficient and insufficient nitrogen: i. genetic-physiologic yield components. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 37(3): 75-84.‏
  2. Al-karhi, F. D. (2014). Effect of Tillage and Culture systems on Growth and Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and Mung Bean (Vigna radiate L.). Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science, 6(1), 135-143.‏
  3. Arakama, N. K. (2009). Profitability of intercropping corn with mungbean and peanut. USM R&D Journal, 17(1), 65-70.‏
  4. Bukvić, G., Antunović, M., Popović, S., & Rastija, M. (2003). Effect of P and Zn fertilisation on biomass yield and its uptake by maize lines (Zea mays L.). Plant soil environ, 49(11), 505-510.‏
  5. Eskandari, H., Ghanbari-Bonjar, A., Galavi, M., & Salari, M. (2009). Forage quality of cow pea (Vigna sinensis) intercropped with corn (Zea mays) as affected by nutrient uptake and light interception. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 37(1), 171-174.‏
  6. Gallegos, J. A. A., & Shibata, J. K. (1989). Effect of water stress on growth and yield of indeterminate dry-bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars. Field Crops Research, 20(2), 81-93.‏
  7. Giller, K. E., Corbeels, M., Nyamangara, J., Triomphe, B., Affholder, F., Scopel, E., & Tittonell, P. (2011). A research agenda to explore the role of conservation agriculture in African smallholder farming systems. Field crops research, 124(3), 468-472.‏
  8. Heldt, H. W., & Piechulla, B. (2010). Plant biochemistry. Academic Press.‏
  9. Ibrahim, A. F., Al-Rawi, K. M., & Salman, A. A. (1977). Performance of corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max.(L.) Merr.) under intercropping in alternative rows and at different plant population densities. Zeitschrift fuer Acker-und Pflanzenbau (Germany, FR).‏
  10. Mandal, B. K., Rajak, S., Mandal, B. B., & Nandy, S. K. (1990). Yield and economics as influenced by intercrops of maize (Zea mays), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and greengram (Phaseolus radiatus). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 60(3), 209-211.‏
  11. Ofori, F., Pate, J. S., & Stern, W. R. (1987). Evaluation of N 2-fixation and nitrogen economy of a maize/cowpea intercrop system using 15 N dilution methods. Plant and soil, 102(2), 149-160.‏
  12. Papastylianou, I. (2004). Effect of rotation system and N fertilizer on barley and vetch grown in various crop combinations and cycle lengths. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 142(1), 41-48.‏ 
  13. Raun, W. R., & Johnson, G. V. (1999). Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agronomy journal, 91(3), 357-363.‏
  14. Seran, T. H., & Brintha, I. (2010). Review on maize based intercropping. Journal of agronomy, 9(3), 135-145.‏
  15. Shen, Q., & Chu, G. (2004). Bi-directional nitrogen transfer in an intercropping system of peanut with rice cultivated in aerobic soil. Biology and fertility of soils, 40(2), 81-87.‏
  16. Shivay, Y. S., Singh, R. P., & Pandey, C. S. (1999). Response of nitrogen in maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy (India).‏
  17. Steel, R. G., & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, 481.‏
  18. Trachsel, S., Kaeppler, S. M., Brown, K. M., & Lynch, J. P. (2011). Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant and soil, 341(1-2), 75-87.‏
  19. Willey, R. W., Natarajan, M., Reddy, M. S., Rao, M. R., Nambiar, P. T. C., Kannaiyan, J., & Bhatnagar, V. S. (1983). Intercropping studies with annual crops. In Better crop for food (pp. 88-100). London: Pitman.
  20. Wu, K., & Wu, B. (2014). Potential environmental benefits of intercropping annual with leguminous perennial crops in Chinese agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 188, 147-149.‏
Statistics
Article View: 204
PDF Download: 242


Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus.com