Khazaal, A., Ismael, W. (1970). Evaluation of Outcomes Associated with the Use of Screwable Basal and Compressive Immediately Loaded Dental Implants (Comparative Study).. Alustath, 20(4), 355-360. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.1970.170481
Ahmed Faris Khazaal; Waleed Khalil Ismael. "Evaluation of Outcomes Associated with the Use of Screwable Basal and Compressive Immediately Loaded Dental Implants (Comparative Study).". Alustath, 20, 4, 1970, 355-360. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.1970.170481
Khazaal, A., Ismael, W. (1970). 'Evaluation of Outcomes Associated with the Use of Screwable Basal and Compressive Immediately Loaded Dental Implants (Comparative Study).', Alustath, 20(4), pp. 355-360. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.1970.170481
Khazaal, A., Ismael, W. Evaluation of Outcomes Associated with the Use of Screwable Basal and Compressive Immediately Loaded Dental Implants (Comparative Study).. Alustath, 1970; 20(4): 355-360. doi: 10.52573/ipmj.1970.170481

Evaluation of Outcomes Associated with the Use of Screwable Basal and Compressive Immediately Loaded Dental Implants (Comparative Study).

Iraqi Postgraduate Medical Journal
Article 9, Volume 20, Issue 4, October 2021, Pages 355-360    PDF (268.34 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.52573/ipmj.1970.170481
Authors
Ahmed Faris Khazaal; Waleed Khalil Ismael
Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Al-Yarmook Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
Abstract
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND: 
The use of immediately loaded basal dental implants in the treatment of partial or completely edentulous patients is one of the new methods; this method was invented to avoid pre-implant surgical procedures to decrease treatment time, cost, and surgical morbidity.
AIM OF THE STUDY:
This study aimed to evaluate the primary stability of basal and compressive dental implants by the use of periotest M and the evaluation of complications of these implants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:   
A total of (158) dental implants were used in (31) patients, basal and compressive DI was sued and the primary stability of each implant was determined by the use of periotest M. the entire DI was loaded immediately and followed up for six months.
RESULTS:
There was a significant correlation between the primary stability and DI dimension, (p>0.05),                      a significant increase in bone resorption in correlation to time of implant insertion. 
CONCLUSION:
 Within the limitation of this study, the use of a greater dimension of basal DI increases the primary stability, and the survival of basal and compressive immediately loaded DI was accepted (98.11%).
 
 
Keywords
complications; Screwable; Basal; compressive; Immediately loaded dental implants
References
  1. Yadav R. S, Sangur R, Mahajan T, Rajanikant A. V, Singh N, Singh R:  An Alternative to Conventional Dental Implants: Basal Implants. Rama Univ J DentSci, 2015;2:22-28.
  2. Sharma Rahul, Prakash Jai, Anand Dhruv, Hasti Anurag :  Basal Implants- An Alternate Treatment Modality for Atrophied Ridges. IJRID 2016;6:60-72.
  3. Ihde K.A.Stefan, Ihde A.Antonian(2014): introduction in to the work with a strategic implant 2014;2:13-15.
  4. Sim, C. P., & Lang, N. P. : Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell™ mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length. Clinical Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 598-604.
  5. Mistry, G., Shetty, O., Shetty, S., & Singh, R. D. :  Measuring implant stability: A review of different methods. J Dent Implant,2014; 4: 165-69.
  6. Satwalekar, P., Nalla, S., Reddy, R., &Chowdary, S. G.: Clinical evaluation of osseointegration using resonance frequency analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc.2015; 15:192-99.
  7. Swami, V., Vijayaraghavan, V., & Swami, V.: Current trends to measure implant stability. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016;16:124-30.
  8. Guncu, M.,Demiralp, B.,Muhtarogullari, M., Guncu, G.. Comparison of implant stability values measured by resonance frequencanalysis between short and long dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014; 25.
  9. Bilhan H., Geckili O., Mumcu E., Bozdag E., Sünbüloğlu E., & Kutay O. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. J Oral Rehabil, 2010; 37:900-7.
 

10. Ostman P, Hellman M, Wendelhag I, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency analysis measurements of implants at placement surgery. Int J Prosthodont. 2006; 19:77–83.

11. Gehrke, S. A., Neto, S., Tavares, U., Rossetti, P. H. O., Watinaga, S. E., Giro, G., &Shibli, J. A. Stability of implants placed in fresh sockets versus healed alveolar sites: Early findings. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 27:577-82.

12. Su-Gwan Kim:: Clinical Complications of Dental Implants, 2011; 467-88.

13. Fridus Van der Weijden,  Federico Dell'Acqua,  Dagmar Else Slot: Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post‐extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review,j 2009;36: 1048-58.

14. Hendrik Naujokat, Burkhard Kunzendorf and Jörg Wiltfang: Dental implants and diabetes mellitus-a systematic review International Journal of Implant Dentistry2016 2:5.

Statistics
Article View: 85
PDF Download: 124


Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus.com