Accuracy Assessment of Digital Elevation Models Produced From Different Geomatics Data | ||
| Engineering and Technology Journal | ||
| Article 2, Volume 38, 11A, November 2020, Pages 1580-1592 PDF (1.98 M) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.30684/etj.v38i11A.1318 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Imzahim Abdulkareem1; Zina Walid Samuel2; Qassim K. Abdullah* 3 | ||
| 1university of technology | ||
| 2Civil Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad ,Iraq | ||
| 3Civil Engineering Department, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq, | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Digital Elevation Models (DEM) are now being used in several geospatial applications. DEMs play an important role in the preliminary surveys for constructing dams and reservoirs, highways, canals, and projects in which earth work is essential. In many remote sensing applications, DEMs have become a significant tool for InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) processing, ground cover classification and images ortho-rectification. In this study, the accuracy of DEMs obtained from ALOS V1.1, ASTER V2, SRTM V3 and other obtained from a pair of Pleiades high-resolution (PHR) 1B satellites in a study area were evaluated after comparing them with high accuracy GNSS/RTK checkpoints. The SRTM3, ALOS V1.1, ASTER V2 DEM revealed a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 2.234m, 0.838m, and 15.116m respectively; while the DEM which is produced from a 0.5m resolution of Pleiades 0.5m shows an RMSE of 0.642m. The correct bias Linear transformation algorithm was used and the RMSE results were: SRTM V3 (1.319m), ALOS V1.1 (0.830m), ASTER V2 (3.815m), and PHR (0.433m). The results showed that the ALOS V1.1 model is the most accurate of the open source models followed by the SRTM V3 model and then followed by ASTER V2. The results obtained from a pair by Pleiades high-resolution (PHR) 1B satellites show a higher accuracy than the results obtained from the open source models. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| accuracy assessment; DEM; Open source; remote sensing | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] A. A. A. Hassan, “Accuracy Assessment of Open Source Digital Elevation Models,” J. Univ. Babylon, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 23–33, 2018. [2] S. Nasir, I. A. Iqbal, Z. Ali, and A. Shahzad, “Accuracy assessment of digital elevation model generated from pleiades tri stereo-pair,” RAST 2015 - Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Recent Adv. Sp. Technol., pp. 193–197, 2015. [3] U. Alganci, B. Besol, and E. Sertel, “Accuracy assessment of different digital surface models,” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Information, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2018. [4] K. Zhang, D. Gann, M. Ross, Q. Robertson, J. Sarmiento, S. Santana, J. Rhome, and C. Fritz, “Accuracy assessment of ASTER, SRTM, ALOS, and TDX DEMs for Hispaniola and implications for mapping vulnerability to coastal flooding,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 225, no. November 2018, pp. 290–306, 2019. [5] S. Zhao, W. Cheng, C. Zhou, X. Chen, S. Zhang, Z. Zhou, H. Liu, and H. Chai, “Accuracy assessment of the ASTER GDEM and SRTM3 DEM: An example in the Loess Plateau and North China plain of China,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 32, no. 23, pp. 8081–8093, 2011. [6] L. J. M. Di Gregorio, A., and Jansen, “Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual,” Fao, vol. 53, no. January 2000, p. 179, 2000. [7] D. Acquisition, K. Heidemann, U. S. G. Survey, D. Smith, and D. S. Mapping, “ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data,” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2015. [8] K. Pakoksung and M. Takagi, “Digital elevation models on accuracy validation and bias correction in vertical,” Model. Earth Syst. Environ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2016. [9] D. Maune, “Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications. The DEM Users Manual,” Am. Soc. Photogramm. Remote Sensing, Bethesda, p. 540 pp., 2001 | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 279 PDF Download: 355 |
||