Assessing the Level of Reflective Thinking in Engineering Teachers During the Process of Research Action | ||
Engineering and Technology Journal | ||
Article 4, Volume 37, 4C, December 2019, Pages 407-412 PDF (611.01 K) | ||
Document Type: Research Paper | ||
DOI: 10.30684/etj.37.4C.4 | ||
Authors | ||
Raudhah Ali1; Abdulhadi M. Al-Saady2; Najah M.L. Al Maimuri3 | ||
1Temenggong Ibrahim Teachers, Training Institute, Malaysia | ||
2Al-Mustaqbal Unversity College, Hillah - Iraq | ||
3Al Furat Al Awsat Technical University, Najaf - Iraq | ||
Abstract | ||
A hydrogeologic study has been adopted to conceptualize the concepts of groundwater levels lowering in swamped area of Tyass, middle of Iraq. 2D dimensional groundwater model and, mitigation model have been used to mitigate the aquifer against high salinity and chemical pollutants by the mitigation theory of heterogeneous subsurface media which basically depends upon physical and mathematical derivation, evaluation of chemical pollutants and total dissolved salts (TDS) of subsurface water before and after mitigation process. The water table level was lowered up to 2.43m at the center of a pumping well of abstraction discharge (400m3/day) obtained after 2755days in steady state. The ions concentrations of iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), mercury (Cu), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb) and TDS in groundwater of 0.4, 3.25, 1.15, 0.004, 0.033 mg/liter and 7000ppm respectively were reduced to less than the allowable limits according to WHO of 0.3, 3, 1, 0.003, 0.01mg/liter, 1200ppm respectively by adding 0.2WD of fresh water from Hillah river and using maximum no. of pumping wells of (19 at April) after 240 months. The mitigation period was reduced to 120 months when the addition of solvent volume was doubled. Mitigation process in heterogeneous against high saline levels and chemical pollutants has been proven to be a good tool to rehabilitation of polluted aquifers. | ||
Keywords | ||
groundwater modeling; mitigation model; Chemical pollutants; Saline level | ||
References | ||
[1] L. Stenhouse, “Introduction to curriculum research and development,” London: Heinemens, 1975. [2] C. Macintyre, “The art of action research in the classroom,” London: David Dulton Publishers, 2000. [3] J. Dewey, “How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process,” New York: D.C. Heath and Company, 1975. [4] M. Van Manen, “Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical,” Curriculum inquiry, 6, 3, 205-228, 1977. [5] D. McLaughlin, & P. Hanifin, “Reflection, Rhetoric or Reality: A Case Study in Preservice Teacher Education,” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 20, 1, 1995. [6] B.E. Steffy, M.P. Wolfe, S.H. Pasch, & B.J. Enz, “The model and its application,” In B.E. Steffy, M. P. Wolfe, S. H. Pasch, & B. J. Enz, (Eds.), Life cycle of the career Teacher pp. 1-25. California: Kappa Delta Pi and Corwin Press, Inc, 2000. [7] G.L. Taggart, A.P Wilson, “Promoting Reflective Thinking in Teachers,” 44 Action Strategies. USA: Corwin Press, Inc, 1998. [8] M. Burbank, L. Ramirez & A. Bates, “Critically Reflective Thinking in Urban Teacher Education: A Comparative Case Study of Two Participants,” Experiences as Content Area Teachers. The Professional Educator, Vol. 36, No. 2, fall 2012, 2012. [9] F. Dervent, “The Effect of Reflective Thinking on The Teaching Practices of Preservice Physical Education Teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25, 3, pg. 260-275, 2015. [10] F.S. Bolin, “Helping student teachers think about teaching,” Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 2, 48-54, 1998. [11] A.E. Richert, “Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of programme structure,” Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 509-527, 1990. [12] D.A. Schon, “Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions,” San Francisco: JosseyBass, 1987. [13] D. Boud, R. Keogh, D. dan Walker, “Reflection: Turning experience into learning,” London: Kogan Page, 1985. [14] J. Loughran, & D. Corrigan, “Teaching portfolios: A strategy for developing learning and teaching in the pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 6, 565-577, 1995. [15] J. Mezirow, “Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning,” San Francisco: JosseBass, 1991. [16] M. Giovannelli, “Relationship between Reflective Disposition toward Teaching and Effective Teaching,” The Journal of Educational Research. 5, 293-309, 2003. [17] G.J. Henderson, “Reflective Teaching: The Study of Constructivist Practices,” New York: Cornell University Press, 1996. [18] S. Kemmis, & R. McTaggart, “The action research planner,” Ed. ke-3. Victoria: Deakin University, 1988. [19] S. Grundy & S. Kemmis, “Educational action research in Australia: the state of the art (overview),” Dlm. Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (pnyt). The action research reader, hlm. 321-336. Ed. ke-3. Victoria: Deakin University, 1981. [20] C. Poyraz & S. Usta, “Investigation of Preservice Teachers’s Reflective Thinking Tendencies,” In Terms of Various Variances. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Impilcations. April 2013. Vol (4), pg 126-135, 2013. [21] L. Hoover, “Reflective writing as a window on preservice teachers' thought processes,” Teaching and Teacher Education. 10, 1, 83-93, 1994. [22] B.P. Ying, “Pelaksanaan kerja kursus berportfolio dalam kursus diploma perguruan Malaysia,” Tesis Doktor. Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 2002. [23] M.B. Miles and A.M. Huberman, “Qualitative data analysis,” 2 nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1994. [24] K.M. Zeichner, & D.P. Liston, “Teaching student teachers to reflect,” Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 23-49, 1987. [25] H. Gelter, “Why is reflective thinking uncommon,” Reflective Practice, 4(3), 337-344, 2003. [26] M. Van Manen, “Writing Qualitatively,” or the demands of writing Keynote Address: Third Nordic Interdisciplinary Conference on Qualitative Methods, 2006. [27] Z. Knowles, D. Gilbourne, B. Cropley, B. & L. Dugdill, “Reflecting on reflection and journeys,” New York: Routledge, 2004. [28] A. Castro, “Themes in the research on preservice teachers’ views of cultural diversity: Implications for researching millennial preservice teachers,” Educational Researcher, 39, 3, 198–210, 2010. [29] M. Md. Jaafar, “Pelaksanaan kajian tindakan oleh guru di sekolah,” Tesis Ijazah Sarjana, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 2006. | ||
Statistics Article View: 235 PDF Download: 181 |