Experimental Investigation on Electrochemical Grinding (ECG) for Stainless Steel 316 | ||
| Engineering and Technology Journal | ||
| Article 3, Volume 38, 1A, January 2020, Pages 20-25 PDF (779.87 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.30684/etj.v38i1A.176 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Abdullah J. Ghadban* 1; Abbas F. Ibrahim2 | ||
| 1Production Engineering and Metallurgy Dept., Baghdad, Iraq. 71409@student.uotechnology.edu.iq | ||
| 2Production Engineering and Metallurgy Dept., Baghdad, Iraq. abbasfadhel_2006@yahoo.com | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This research focuses on material removal rate (MRR) and surface roughness during electrochemical grinding (ECG) for stainless steel 316. The effect of applied current, electrolyte concentration, gap size and spindle speed on machining performances has been studied. Where applied current used are (10, 20, 30, 40) A, electrolyte concentration used (100, 150, 200, 250) g/l, gap size used (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5) mm and spindle speed used (75, 150, 180, 280) rpm. Through the Taguchi design based experimental study the characteristic features of the ECG process are discussed. Where the maximum MRR can be obtained at 40 A of the current, 250 g/l of the concentration, 0.2 mm of the gap and 180 rpm of spindle speed. The best surface roughness can be obtained at 10 A of the current, 200 g/l of the concentration, 0.4 mm of the gap and 280 rpm of spindle speed.. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Electrochemical grinding (ECG); stainless steel 316; MRR; Surface Roughness; Non-Traditional Machining; hybrid machining | ||
| References | ||
|
[1] D. S. Patel, V. K. Jain, and J. Ramkumar, “Electrochemical grinding,” Nanofinishing Sci. Technol. Basic Adv. Finish, Polishing Process., no. November, pp. 321–352, 2016.
[2] K. Gupta, N. K. Jain, and R. F. Laubscher, “Assisted hybrid machining processes,” SpringerBriefs Appl. Sci. Technol., no. 9783319259208, pp. 45–65, 2016.
[3] A. B. Puri and S. Banerjee, “Multiple-response optimization of electrochemical grinding characteristics through response surface methodology,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 64, no. 5–8, pp. 715–725, 2013.
[4] T. Kurita, C. Endo, Y. Matsui et al. “Mechanical/electrochemical complex machining method for efficient,” Accurate, and Environmentally Benign Process. Int J Mach Tool Manu, 48, 15, 1599-1604, 2008.
[5] V.A. Mogilnikov, M. Y. Chmir, Y. S. Timofeev et al. “Diamond ECM grinding of ceramic-metal tungsten, Procedia CIRP; 6:407–409, 2013.
[6] T. M. A. Maksoud and A. J. Brooks, “Electrochemical Grinding of ceramic form tooling," J. Mater. Process. Tech., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 70–75, 1995.
[7] S. Roy, A. Bhattacharyya, and S. Banerjee, “Analysis of effect of voltage on surface texture in electrochemical grinding by autocorrelation function,” Tribol. Int., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1387–1393, 2007.
[8] R. N. Goswami, S. Mitra, and S. Sarkar, “Experimental investigation on electrochemical grinding (ECG) of alumina-aluminum interpenetrating phase composite,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 40, no. 7–8, pp. 729–741, 2009.
[9] K. Z. Molla and A. Manna, “Optimization of Electrochemical grinding parameters for effective finishing of hybrid Al/(Al2O3+ZrO2) MMC,” Int. J. Surf. Eng. Interdiscip. Mater. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 35–45, 2013.
[10] S. Bhandari and N. Shukla, “Parametric optimization of electrochemical machining process by particle swarm optimization technique,” vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 13–19, 2015.
[11] N. S. Qu, Q. L. Zhang, X. L. Fang, E. K. Ye, and D. Zhu, “Experimental investigation on electrochemical grinding of inconel 718,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 35, pp. 16–19, 2015. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 280 PDF Download: 190 |
||