Kadhim, M. (2019). Effect of ethanol extracted propolis (EEP) on growth performance in the meat type Japanese quails. Alustath, 6(1), 1-15.
Mohammed Jard Kadhim. "Effect of ethanol extracted propolis (EEP) on growth performance in the meat type Japanese quails". Alustath, 6, 1, 2019, 1-15.
Kadhim, M. (2019). 'Effect of ethanol extracted propolis (EEP) on growth performance in the meat type Japanese quails', Alustath, 6(1), pp. 1-15.
Kadhim, M. Effect of ethanol extracted propolis (EEP) on growth performance in the meat type Japanese quails. Alustath, 2019; 6(1): 1-15.

Effect of ethanol extracted propolis (EEP) on growth performance in the meat type Japanese quails

Journal of Kerbala for Agricultural Sciences
Article 1, Volume 6, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 1-15    PDF (907.13 K)
Document Type: Original Article
Author
Mohammed Jard Kadhim
Department of Animal production,College of Technical Almusiab ,University of Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical
Abstract
The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the performance of two varieties of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)  with three plant densities (40, 50 and  60 thousands of  plants.ha-1.)  and estimate the phenotypic, genotypic and environment variation, phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation, heritability, stability and genetic resultant, for two seasons. The experiments were conducted during spring and fall seasons of 2013, using factorial experiment within RCBD with four replicates. The results showed the superiority of Shimoos variety, it gives seed yield 3.345 t.ha-1 compared with Aqmar variety which gave 2.375 t.ha-1 in spring season, at fall season Shimoos variety gave 6.265 t.ha-1, while Aqmar variety gave 5.379 t.ha-1. The yield increased with plant density increasing, it ranged from 2.425 to 3.222t.ha-1 in spring season and from 4.396 to 5.822t.ha-1 in fall season. The values of phenotypic stability were different according to differences between varieties and seasons. The high value was 93.75% for disc area followed by 90.13% for seed yield t.ha-1 for Aqmar in spring season and the higher value for Shimoos variety was 94.15 for disc area followed by 90.66% and 90.55% for 100 seed weight and number of seeds in disc respectively. . All values of genetic variation are higher than environment variation, and were closed to phenotypic variations for spring and fall seasons, except for seed number in disc in fall season which was less than environment variation. Hence the heritability for these traits were high and ranges from 63% for seed number in disc to 95% for shoot dry weight in spring season and from 33% for seed number in disc to 99.6% for disc area in fall season. So the genetic coefficient of variation for all traits is closed to phenotypic coefficient variation. The traits: plant growth rate and shoot dry weight for Aqmar, and leaf area index, plant growth rate and seeds yield for Shimoos showed non phenotypic stability in spring season. In fall season, seed yield t.ha-1 for Aqmar was the only trait non-phenotypic stable. The genetic results are ranged from 65.32% for shoot dry weight to 98.86% for seed number in disc for Aqmar and from 81.34% for seed number in disc to 114.79% for 100 seed weight for Shimoos in spring. In fall season, it ranges from 69.18 for leaf area index to 96.02% for seed number in disc for Aqmar and from 89.25% for seed number in disc to 107.32% for disc area for ShimoosIt is possible to conclude that Shimoos variety was superior in most of the traits. So we recommend planting Shimoos variety in the fall season, because it is more stable than Aqmar variety, while Aqmar variety can be cultivated in the spring season.
Keywords
quail; meat type; Growth performance
References
  1. Abbas, R. J. (2014). Effect of dietary supplementation with differing levels of propolis on productivity and blood parameters in broiler chicks. Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research., 13(2), 164-179.
  2. Abdel-Rahman, M. A., & Mosaad, G. M. (2013). Effect of propolis as additive on some behavioural patterns, performance and blood parameters in Muscovy broiler ducks. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, 3(2), 64-68.
  3. Açıkgöz, Z., Yücel, B., & Altan, Ö. (2005) The effects of propolis supplementation on broiler performance and feed digestibility. Arch. Geflügelk, 69(3), 117-122
  4. Ahn, M. R., Kumazawa, S., Usui, Y., Nakamura, J., Matsuka, M., Zhu, F., Nakayama, T. (2007). Antioxidant activity and constituents of propolis collected in various areas of China. Food Chemistry, v.101, p.1383–1392.
  5. Ayala, F., Lembo, G., Nappa, P., & Balato, N. (1985). Contact dermatitis from propolis. Contact Dermatitis, 12(3), 181-182.
  6. Biavatti, M. W., Bellaver, M. H., Volpato, L., Costa, C., & Bellaver, C. (2003).Preliminary studies of alternative feed additives for broilers: Alternanthera brasiliana extract, propolis extract and linseed oil. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 5(2), 147-151.
  7. Bjorkner, B. E. (1994) Industrial airborne dermatoses. Dermatologic clinics,12(3), 501-509.
  8. Canogullari, S., Baylan, M., Sahinler, N., & Sahin, A. (2009). Effects of propolis and pollen supplementations on growth performance and body components of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Arch. Geflugelk, 73(3), 173-178.
  9. Castaldo, S., & Capasso, F. (2002). Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia, 73, S1-S6.
  10. Cirasino, L., Pisati, A., & Fasani, F. (1987). Contact dermatitis from propolis. Contact dermatitis, 16(2), 110-111.
  11. Daneshmand, A., Sadeghi, G. H., & Karimi, A. (2012). The effects of a combination of garlic, oyster mushroom and propolis extract in comparison to antibiotic on growth performance, some blood parameters and nutrients digestibility of male broilers . Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science , 14(2), 141-147.
  12. Denli, M., Cankaya, S., Silici, S., Okan, F., & Uluocak, A. N. (2005). Effect of dietary addition of Turkish propolis on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and serum variables of quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 18(6), 848-854.
  13. Dobrowolski, J. W., Vohora, S. B., Sharma, K., Shah, S. A., Naqvi, S. A. H., & Dandiya, P. C. (1991). Antibacterial, antifungal, antiamoebic, antiinflammatory and antipyretic studies on propolis bee products. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 35(1), 77-82.
  14. El-Ghammry, A. A., El-Mallah, G. M., & El-Yamny, A. T. (2002). The effect of incorporation yeast culture, Nigella sativa seeds and fresh garlic in broiler diets on their performance. Egyptian Poultry Science, 22, 445-459.
  15. Esser, B. (1986). Allergy due to propolis. Aktuelle dermatologie, 12, 203-205.
  16. Galal, A., El-Motaal, A. A., Ahmed, A. M. H., & Zaki, T. G. (2008). Productive performance and immune response of laying hens as affected by dietary propolis supplementation. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7(3), 272-278.
  17. Ghisalberti, E. L. (1979). Propolis: a review. Bee world, 60(2), 59-84.
  18. Giurgea, R., Poprescu, H., Polinicencu, C., Copreanu, D., & Moje, D. (1982). Effects of standardized propolis extract on the central lymphatic system and the immunological reactions of chickens. Clujul Medical, 55(1), 72-76.
  19. Harnaj, V. (1978) A remarkable hive product: propolis. Scientific data and suggestions concerning its composition, properties and possible use in therapeutics.
  20. Harnaj, V. (1978). A remarkable hive product: propolis. Scientific data and suggestions concerning its composition, properties and possible use in therapeutics.
  21. Hassan, M. G., & Abdulla, T. A. (2011). The effect of propolis feed supplementation on hygiene and performance of broiler chickens . Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 25(2).
  22. Hausen, B. M., Wollenweber, E., Senff, H., & Post, B. (1987). Propolis allergy: (I). Origin, properties, usage and literature review. Contact dermatitis, 17(3), 163-170.
  23. Kleczek, K., Wilkiewicz-Wawro, E., Wawro, K., Makowski, W., Murawska, D., & Wawro, M. (2014). The effect of dietary propolis supplementation on the growth performance of broiler chickens. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 29(2), 105-117.
  24. Kujumgiev, A., Tsvetkova, I., Serkedjieva, Y., Bankova, V., Christov, R., & Popov, S. (1999). Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis of different geographic origin. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 64(3), 235-240.
  25. Li, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2002). Effects of ration supplemented with propolis on live weight gain of broilers. China Poult, 24(2), 22.
  26. Mahmoud, U. T., Abdel-Rahman, M. A., & Darwish, M. H. A. (2013). The effect of Chinese propolis supplementation on Ross broiler performance and carcass characteristics. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, 3(4), 154-160.
  27. Marcucci, M. C. (1995). Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie, 26(2), 83-99.
  28. Monti, M., Bertt, E., Carminati, G., & Cusini, M. (1983). Occupational and cosmetic dermatitis from propolis. Contact dermatitis, 9(2), 163-163.
  29. Popiela- Pleban. E. (2013) The influence of propolis and bee pollen on selected egg quality traits and physiological blood indicators of laying hens. PhD thesis. Wroclaw, Poland.
  30. Sahin, A., Baylan, M., & Sahinler, N. (2001). The effects of propolis on fattening performance and carcass traits of Japanese quail.
  31. SAS Institute. (2014). SAS 9.4 Output delivery system: User's guide. SAS Institute.
  32. Seven, I., Seven, P. T., & Silici, S. (2011). Effects of dietary Turkish propolis as alternative to antibiotic on growth and laying performances, nutrient digestibility and egg quality in laying hens under heat stress. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire, 162(4), 186-191.
  33. Seven, P. T., Seven, I., Yılmaz, M., & Şimşek, Ü. G. (2008). The effects of Turkish propolis on growth and carcass characteristics in broilers under heat stress. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 146(1-2), 137-148.
  34. Shalmany, S. K., & Shivazad, M. (2006). The effect of diet propolis supplementation on Ross broiler chicks performance. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5(1), 84-88.
  35. Sibel, S., Mrsel, K., & Elcin, B. (2007). Effect of the propolis on the performance and carcass characteristics of growing quail.
  36. Silici, S., Karabaccak, M., Balci, E., & Çankaya, S. (2007). Effect of the propolis on the performance and carcass characteristics of growing quail. Mellifera, 7.
  37. Tekeli, A., Kutlu, H. R., & Celik, L. (2011). Effects of Z. officinale and propolis extracts on the performance, carcass and some blood parameters of broiler chicks. Current Research in Poultry Science, 1(1), 12-23.
  38. United States Department of Agriculture. USDA. (1985) United States Standards for Grades of Extracted Honey. Agricultural Marketing Service. Fruit and Vegetable Division. Processed Products Branch. Washington, DC.
  39. Zanato, J. A. F., Neto, A. C., dos Santos, E., Lui, J. F., Malheiros, E. B., da Silva, L. D. P. G., & Coloni, R. D. (2007). Effect of propolis alcoholic extract on the weight gain, carcass traits and cecal pH of growing rabbits. Biotemas, 20(2), 59-64.
  40. Zeng, Z., Liu, S., Pan, K., Wu, H., & Tang, K. (2004). Effects of pollen and propolis on productive and immune performance in meat fowl. Zhongguo nongye kexue, 37(5), 751-755.
  41. Zeng, Z., Liu, S., Pan, K., Wu, H., and Tang, K. (2003) Effects of pollen and propolis on productive and immune performance in meat fowl. Zhongguo nongye kexue, 37(5), 751-755
  42. Ziaran, H. R., Rahmani, H. R., & Pourreza, J. (2005). Effect of dietary oil extract of propolis on immune response and broiler performance. Pak J Biol Sci, 8(10), 1485-90.
Statistics
Article View: 315
PDF Download: 102


Journal Management System. Powered by ejournalplus.com