A qualitative Study of Digital Dermatoglyphices In Relation With ABO Blood Groups | ||
| Journal of University of Anbar for Pure Science | ||
| Article 21, Volume 2, Issue 3, December 2008, Pages 88-98 PDF (1020.26 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37652/juaps.2008.15610 | ||
| Author | ||
| Omer Kahtan Yaseen* | ||
| General Directorate of Anbar Education / Heat Education | ||
| Abstract | ||
| This study addressed the breakdown of the three main models for fingerprints and its subsidiaries and their relationship by blood collections system (ABO) - Students of Life Sciences Department - Faculty of Education - University of Anbar, including the ten fingers of both hands. The models show that more common among members of the sample is a Alaruyat rate Percentage (56.67%), followed by Almstdiratt and percentage (36.83%) and least bows and a percentage (6.33%), while the fingers of one hand, it was noted that the middle finger right Walid is pregnant for the bulk of the Alaruyat and percentage (72.5%) and least ring finger and by (40%) As for the finger Pinkie is pregnant for the bulk of the Alaruyat for labor and the left percentage (74.166%) and least finger Central by (48.333%), and for Mstdiratt ring finger was the right of the labor is pregnant for the bulk of the Almstdiratt and percentage (54.166 %) And least finger Central and Pinky and the percentage respectively (25.833%) (25%) as well as labor left ring finger is pregnant for the bulk of the Almstdiratt and percentage (54.833%) and least Pinkie finger percentage (17.5%). As for the brackets were The index finger is the most hesitant and percentage (10%) of the labor right and left Walid (12.5%). To investigate the relationship of blood groups as the (ABO) of the fingers. Alaruyat found that individuals living with blood groups (A, B, O, AB) were more numerous in Central finger for labor and the right percentage (76.324%), while individuals living with blood groups (A, B, AB) was the index finger is a less number of Alaruyat and percentage (32.903%), while for the group Blood (O) found that the ring finger is carrying the least number of Alaruyat rate (28.571%). As for labor, the left-positive individuals blood groups (AB, O, B, A) was Pinkie finger with a greater number of Alaruyat and percentage (82.755%) The individuals living with blood groups (O, B), the index finger a lower number of Alaruyat and percentage (20.027%), but for individuals living with blood groups (A, AB,), the ring finger with fewer Alaruyat and percentage (41.089%). For Mstdiratt found that individuals living with blood group (A) For Walid right thumb was that a larger number of Almstdiratt and percentage (16.091%) The individuals living with blood groups (O, AB), the ring finger is a larger number of Almstdiratt and percentage (22.499%), while individuals living with blood groups (O, A) was pointing Central is a less number of Almstdiratt, and individuals living with blood group (AB) found that finger Pinkie was a less number of Almstdiratt percentage ( 8.333%), while for the left hand, found that individuals living with the blood groups (AB, O, A), the ring is a larger number of Almstdiratt and percentage (17.165%), while people living with blood group (B) was the index finger is , Which holds the largest number of Almstdiratt percentage (17.360%), while for individuals living with blood groups (B, AB) found that a lower number of Pinky and the percentage (5.343%). As for the brackets found that the index finger of both hands and is the largest number of pregnant and all Blood groups (AB, O, B, A). There was a convergence of some difference in the qualities and other attributes when comparing the results with the results of other research areas of genetic different. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| ABO | ||
| References | ||
|
1-Mellor, G.S. (1968) Dermatoglyphics in schizophreni. Brit. J. psychiat, 114; 1387- 1397.
2- AL – Janaby, A. A. M. (1978) A study of Dermatoglphic characteristics in schizophrenia patientis. M. SC. Thesis. Baghdad University. Iraq.
3- Cummins, H. and Midlo, C. (1961). Finger prints, palms and soles, An Introduction to | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 148 PDF Download: 94 |
||