Tolerance determination of Four wheat Cultivars to different Levels of Salinity | ||
| Journal of University of Anbar for Pure Science | ||
| Article 7, Volume 3, Issue 1, April 2009, Pages 19-22 PDF (710.87 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.37652/juaps.2009.15542 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Abd ul Lateef M. Ali1; Mohemed O. Salman* 2; Hamdi J. Hamadi1 | ||
| 1Anbar University - College of Agriculture | ||
| 2Directorate of Agriculture in Anbar Governorate | ||
| Abstract | ||
| A pot study was implemented at Al _ Dawar Research Station during 2005-2006 according to R-C-B-D arranged as split plots with five replicates . four wheat Cultivars (IpA99، Sham 6 ، Tamooz and Abu- Graib ) were used as main treatments and five salinity levels (3 , 6 , 9 , 12 and 15 ds/m as secondary treatment . The aim of the study was to evaluate four wheat cultivars tolerance to different levels of sallnity . Result showed that yield and its components decreased with elevating salt level , especially at 12 and 15 ds/m . moreover , there were differences exist between cultivars ( IpA 99 and Sham6 ) were the most tolerant comparing with other cultivars . | ||
| References | ||
|
1-Maas, E.V. and Hoffman, G.J. (1977) crop salt tolerance. current assessment.J. of the Errigation and drainage Division. Vol.12. (3) p.115 - 130.
2- Sz alai, I- 1968 plant biology – 60 (8) p223 – 226.
3- Epstein, E. Norlyn, J-D, Rush, D.W. king sbury, R.W. Kelley.D.W. Cunningham, G.A and wrona, A.F.(1980) Saline culture of Grops: Agenetic approach. Sci 210 (5) p – 399 – 404.
4- king sbury.R.w. and Epstein, E. (1984). Selection for salt – resistant spring wheat. crop sci.24 (6) p. 310 – 315.
5- العذاری وأخرون (1989) دراسات وراثیة لحاصل الحبوب البایولوجی ودلیل الحصاد فی حنطة الخبز تحت المستوى العالی من السماد النایتروجینی مجلة البحوث الزراعیة والموارد المائیة ـ المجلد 8 ـ العدد 2 ص 1 – 4.
6- steel, R.G.D. and Torri, J.H.(1960) principles and procedures of statistics with special reference to the biological Sciences Mccgraw- Hill book company – Inc. new York. 14 (4) p. 519 – 540.
7- Jadav, K.I wallihan, E.F., shar pless.R.G. and printy , w.l. 1976 salinity effects on nitrogen use by wheat cultivar sonorabn. Agronomy.38 (3) p. 68 – 222.
8- Stoy. V.(1977). Trocken sub Stan Zproduktion and assimi, Lateveri age rung in das geteidekorn. Z. puan cernahr.boden kunde 140 (2) p. 35 - 50.
9- Cottrell, J.E.D ale , J.E. and Jeff coat , B.(1982) Endo geneo us Control of spikelet initiation and develop ment in barley. British growth regulator. 55(3) p. 35 – 150.
10- Hey land, k.u. (1961) Ub dre bedeutung der Errahrung in Verschiedenen entwick lungs – stadien den Etrag der Sommer grest- ZAcker. u. pllazen bau 116. 4165 in Nicn ael and Beringer 1954.
11- Levitt, s.(1980) Response of plants to environmental stresses U.Z. Academic press New York.
12- AL- shamma , A.M., AL- Rawi, B.A. and saeed S.(1995) screening barley genoty pes for salinity to lerance under naturally salinized fields conditions Vol. 18 (5) 120 – 131. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 223 PDF Download: 100 |
||