And its impact on jurisprudential difference A contemporary issue Reading the Koran by computer or mobile The event has a smaller event | ||
| Journal of The Iraqi University | ||
| Article 1, Volume 2, Issue 33, October 2016, Pages 63-101 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Dr. Rana Simeem; friend of Abdullah Dr.. Amna Mahmoud Shit Khatab | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The high status assumed by the fundamentals of jurisprudence, which is a science of legitimacy, and whose resource was the corrective and revision; correcting the paths of the development of the signs of the book and the year, and a revision of the deductions of the diligent error, made this science is the balance of inference. The fundamentals of jurisprudence are based on three basic pillars: logic, Arabic and jurisprudence. Logic is science, which is almost as a raw material for the industry of jurisprudence, and jurisprudence is the product and fruit of jurisprudence. It is the language of the Arabs in which the Qur'an was revealed, the language of development through which judgments are derived. This study shows that our scholars did not transfer to us the religion of God Bahawihm, but they are doing their best to reach the desired based on the rules and evidence, and that it is not only theoretical rules, but is the rules developed by hardworking to help the diligent to derive the provisions of the evidence, Detailed. The subject of the subject - which is the title of this research - is linked to these three sciences through: 1. Logic: common as a science exists when the people of logic and fundamentalists benefited from it and made it one of the methods of development. 2 - Jurisprudence: The follower of the issues of jurisprudence finds that there are things mentioned in the sources of legislation, but they have been renewed over time from examples of common words that carry more than meaning. 3. Language: Arabic language in its research is looking for the subscriber Kalvz. From this we can say: That the reason for our choice of this research entitled (the joint and its impact on the difference in jurisprudence) is due to two things: First, to prove that the subject of the participant has deep roots due to logic. The second thing: there are contemporary issues, (touch the Koran) (). One of the scandals that have emerged is the electronic development in all aspects of life and the discovery of electronic technologies in the field of audio and informatics, such as the development of sound recording mechanisms, the accuracy of the preservation, and the ease of retrieval, appeared what is now known as electronic synonym. Which is the Koran in electronic devices, and our question is is measured on the Koran known in terms of provisions such as reading the Koran without purification or not? The scholars of the four schools of thought agreed not to read it except in the pure and the apparent opposite, and each of them mentioned his evidence with the correctness of the correct one. Recently, the scholars differed between a proponent and a refusenik to read the Qur'aan. It has been mentioned what we found from the fatwas of scientists old and recent, and we wanted to root these fatwas and what follows. The provisions of this debacle are still the subject of debate among modern jurists. Therefore, the title of this research has been inspired by one of the themes of the conference, which is: the jurisprudence difference between the past and the present. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 25 PDF Download: 3 |
||