Violations of Ibn Hazm to the public in the door of Hajj and Umrah | ||
| Journal of The Iraqi University | ||
| Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 33, October 2016, Pages 249-279 | ||
| Author | ||
| tasem Mahmoud Ismail | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The scholars have discussed ancient and modern comparative jurisprudence between the four schools of thought, or the establishment of an independent doctrine that defends and contradicts others, and those who were fair in his research, a moderate balance between the words and then it is likely what was acceptable in his opinion, Those who violate the doctrine of his imam in response to the claim of right and equity. And some of them were motivated by fanaticism to say, or the words of his imam does not want Hula, and initiates to refute the views of the violators and weaken their words without scrutiny and sufficient research, and did so many of the late owners of the four schools, after the Islamic jurisprudence, The doctrine at the words of the imams, did not exceed it and did not tire themselves to search for evidence, and know the strong from the weak and the most likely of the likely. I chose the doctrine of Ibn Hazm al-Dhahiri, because this jurisprudent left him with no trace of Islamic jurisprudence, and because he was bold and insistent on the views he sees himself as right in him, he is not afraid to do so. I discussed the issues in the chapter on Hajj and Umrah, in which the four or three imams disagreed, and the opinion of one of them differed. And took his views from his book, and did not rely on what others reported on these matters, and made his (local) book the basis of his jurisprudential views. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 140 PDF Download: 70 |
||