Acquisition, Durability, and Productive Abilities in Explicit and Implicit Grammar Instruction | ||
| Journal of The Iraqi University | ||
| Article 1, Volume 3, Issue 32, July 2016, Pages 0-0 | ||
| Authors | ||
| ; Jathla A. Mahmood | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Grammar instruction is a topic of huge controversy among researchers. Many researchers are questioning whether teaching grammar is helpful in acquiring the second language or if it is even necessary. Others considered the methods that should be used in teaching the grammar of the second language and what structures of grammar should be taught. The opinions about the type of instruction needed in grammar varied among teachers and students. As for the students, there was a general agreement that explicit instruction is better: giving reasons such as feeling more secure and comfortable when knowing the grammar rule or that they consider grammar as an important element in their writing, though the teachers may be more concerned with the content than the grammar of the students’ writing. As for the teachers, the opinions fluctuated. Some teachers such as those of the Adult Migrant Education in Australia preferred the implicit instruction within communicative activities. Others like the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) teachers, who are TESOL professionals, were almost all in favor of explicit instruction not only because it is preferred by their students but also some of the teachers themselves think it contributes to the smoothness of the lesson and helps accomplishing the classroom goals.The rest of the teachers believe that explicit instruction and natural exposure both are adequate, each at certain stages of the learning process (Burgess & Etherington, 2002). | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 181 PDF Download: 92 |
||