Reading in the Curriculum of Abu Al-Maari in his Criticism of the Language Mutariabi Miracle Ahmed-Example | ||
| Journal of Univesity of Thi-Qar | ||
| Article 1, Volume 9, Issue 3, September 2014, Pages 1-12 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Sahir Hussain Nasser; Muayad Badri Manhi | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Al-mary had occupied a firm place among the criticisers , rhetoricals and demonstrators. He supplied the Arabic heritage with the Arabic heritage with canons that perpetuated him , represented by his demonstrations , his poetry and his prose. He came with what clear – sighted people could not come with. His demonstration to the divan of Abu – Altaib was considered to be a high ranking demonstration. In his demonstration , he included his rhetorical , linguistic and grammatical opinions. He also stated the perspectives of linguists and rhetoricals. He linguists and rhetoricals. He explained the ambiguous meanings in the poetry of Abu-Altaib exhausted the demonstrators who had tried to explain it because of the very complicated nature of the wording and the accurate authorship of his versification and this was why many linguists tried to study his works. Al-Mary had depended in his criticism on his gustative sensation using the description and analysis. He description and analysis. He rejected any narration that did not match the real accurate meaning that the pote wanted. Wanted. Sometimes , we could see him justify some slips and mistakes by returining them back to some ancient languages. Therefore , his criticism could by considered as a description. Al-mary mentioned causes for his opinions and also showed that some opinions outweigh others that could the poet meant. His opinions this furthermore , he did not want to be very strict as this could become a material for criticizing by his counterparts. Al-Mary depended in his explanation on the opinions of Ibin-Juny because the explanation of Ibin-Juny was one of the oldest explanation for Abu-Altaibs poetry. He revealed some linguistic errors as a warning from expert criticizer in poetry. He came up with the idea that error was a failure from the poet was a failure from the poet and not from the Arabic language , because the language gave us a expressive flexibility ranging from the speaker who don’t have but his innate language to the philosopher , scientist , speaker and well educated people because of the huge resources of words , eloquence tools , rhetoric kinds , and the flexibility they contained on level of structures in the utillisation of words before or their normal positions in the Arabic words before or after their normal positions the Arabic sentence sequence or even deletion of some words which could be understood from the context of the sentence. This flexibility also included declaration , interpretation apposition and other manifestations of this flexibility on levels of sounds , buildings , semantic and methods of expression that revealed the elegance of the minds that spoke with this language. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 209 PDF Download: 48 |
||