Provisions of dhimmis in retribution In Islamic jurisprudence | ||
| Journal of Islamic sciences | ||
| Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 5, April 2017, Pages 438-465 | ||
| Author | ||
| MM Haidar Sami Abdul | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In conclusion reached on the results can be outlined as follows: 1. What is meant by the people of disclosure Almaahidon of the book of the Jews and the Christians, and was Mjriham Kalmjus in the Islamic state who give a covenant with him feel safe on their money, and display and religion. 2. unanimously agreed on the necessity of retribution on the dhimmi if a Muslim was killed, intentionally or dhimmi, and agreed on the necessity of parental dhimmi in the capital, though not his money on Aaqlth if a Muslim was killed, or dhimmi error. 3. The scholars differed in the Muslim rule if there are two views to kill dhimmi, first: Do not take revenge from the Muslim edematous, and the second: truncates it. 4. scholars differed in Alzmi rule if attacked felony without restraint on the Muslim, or edematous deliberately to two views: First, take revenge from dhimmi for a Muslim and edematous, and the second: do not take revenge for a Muslim due to the lack of similar, but should be blood money, and take revenge for invective. The error in the obligatory parental whether the victim is a Muslim, or a dhimmi. 5. scholars differed in the rule of the Muslim if attacked edematous felony without restraint to deliberately there are two views: First, do not take revenge from the Muslim dhimmi; not to reward them, and the second: take revenge from the Muslim dhimmi. As they agreed on the necessity of blood money in error. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 17 PDF Download: 8 |
||