Criticism of Explanation standards in Explanation Books Introduction | ||
| The Arabic Language and Literature | ||
| Article 1, Volume 1, Issue 24, October 2018, Pages 257-274 | ||
| Authors | ||
| OudyJawad Ali Hajjar; Ali MohsinJabur | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Varied interpretation criteria when commentators started including in Mekdmathm and can be summarized as follows: 1. them to make a statement in explanation specialist Messenger (may Allah bless him and his family). 2. Others are added to what came from the Messenger (peace be upon him and his family), what came from the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them). 3. Some of them made the faces of the language and literature of the main criteria of interpretation. 4. others made the criteria defined in Mecca and civil, and private and public, and duplicator and copied, etc. 5. Some of them make the interpretation confined between the knowledge of other verses and verses between faith and the good work that can not be reached only in knowing the mentality of Science and verbal and Mohbah. 6. While some limited knowledge of interpretation adept at scientific meanings and Budaiya and knowledge of science to express. 7. discharge all the science in the Quran are priorities that lead to the knowledge of the Word of God Almighty. 8. reliance on unanimity when we are told nothing about infallible. 9. Make some unfamiliar standards, when required to the interpreter i'tikaaf on a book Sibawayh (T - 180 AH). 10. standards too, is: scientific and philosophical research in verses issues, and interpretation of the Holy Qur'an, in addition to their sense and a sense of Koranic verses. And get out of it the outcome of the final, which most commentators agree on general grounds leaning in the process explanatory represented the science of language and statement and Quranic sciences and modern science, and the science of speech and the principles of jurisprudence and ethics, and the interpreter of the Koran would follow all of the standards and use them in the right places, which specializes out to connect to interpret the closest thing to reality, with no say for sure that this is the real meaning of the text to the possibility that the interpreter has been overlooked for a particular aspect, or is it that God has singled out his knowledge, or what was his statement about the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his family), or guardians and heirs of his knowledge (peace be upon them), and at the end of this paragraph, it is imperative for us to point out what was on the subject in some introductions interpretations. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Criticism of Explanation standards in Explanation Books Introduction | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 107 PDF Download: 25 |
||