ASSESSMENT OF DESIGN QUALITY MANAGEMENT FOR DIYALA CITY PROJECTS USING THE METHOD OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA COMPLEX PROPORTIONAL ASSESSMENT (COPRAS) | ||
| DIYALA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES | ||
| Article 3, Volume 9, Issue 1, March 2016, Pages 13-30 PDF (0 K) | ||
| Author | ||
| Nidal Adnan Jasim | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The design stage considered as one of the basic stages of engineering project life cycle. Even the quality requirements at this stage would be basis to the next levels of preparation, construction and maintenance. The objective of this research work is to study the quality and confirming it in design stage, and how it can be employed technical grounds (The Method Of Multiple Criteria Complex Proportional Assessment) in the assessment of design quality management for Diyala construction projects, through the identication of criteria used to select the best project in terms of design quality management as well as determining the list of Diyala projects in order to choose the optimal project of these terms. For the purpose of a chieving the goal of the research its data collecting from the literature that addressed the objective of design quality mangement and method of multiple criteria complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), and finally personal interviews of qualified desgners and implementers and operators of these projects. The results of data analysis for the sample and then Rank Order Centroid method (ROC) and distinctive in their application showed that criteria of the control of the design output, organizational structure and teams prepar designs, set design input and planning design are the most important criteria for bilateral comparisons between projects, and that the criteria of control of the design output and the organiztionsal structure and teams prepar designs are more important than the rest of criteria in the projects. Finally, and by calculating the relative importance, priorities of alternatives and the benefit degree of the projects we find that advisory clinic project has received the largest share of the benefit and importance compared with other projects. In the end was a set of conclusions and recommendations of Various aspects the topic from accelerate the application of techniques of decision- making multi- criteria in the evalution of projects in addition to expediting the application of the systems proposed by researcher for the design quality mangement to help engineers on the best implementation of this administration. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 206 PDF Download: 79 |
||